Still dont saw - "The study on symbols was exactly made using the author (Wiligut) papers..." - ONE MORE time question, let us to know this super book or books ))))
About original SSHR with diamonds - we are can see examples in Gottleb's book and simple examples here, that was showed
Runology is not a science, what you and your friends have studied there are just assumptions and conjectures, from tabloid newspapers or books of a similar level, all these are fantasies that, as a rule, invented themselves and believed in them themselves)))
My arguments on the stones are stated above, if you haven't learned to read - not my problem ))))
