I think Hapurs testimony was significant here. Besides the obvious, a quick search on haps posts reveals a consistent eye for casting details, casting flaws, cast rings altogether really. Most of the folks who have been collecting for long enough to research the forums can easily see the valuable part hapur plays in identifying cast pieces. He?s called rings cast that Gaspare calls not cast, more than on one occasion.... If ANYone is going to see what Antonio sees it surely has to be hap! Since it is not and hap doesn?t agree with the assessments and the videos and images, I don?t know what else there really is left to say tbh.... just my 2p, Mike
