It is really simple: the rings were either die cast or they were not. They were cast in molds or they were not. They were die struck or they were not. According to Mr. Scapini they were die cast until I proved it impossible. Now were back to plaster and wax molds. And judging by (now erased or cleaned as they like to call it) posts on WAF, it is not a first time he changes his mind. Not to mention the facebook adverts of the WAF thread as saying "here we go with another truth" but when engaged about it simply claims "But not everything is already said, and I can't say it now here" What the hell is the point of reading it then if the truth is not revealed?
I absolutely agree. That is why Im upset - he turned his mind in 4 months (I can declare our conversation, where he is calling me stupid, if I don?t want accept his MICROSCOPIC EVIDENCES) and now he is comming with 180 degrees opposite version and screams again - you MUST accept my MICROSCOPIC EVIDENCES! I am afraid of his behavior because it just brings the confusion between the collectors. The scientist must be sure of his conclusions before presenting it to the public. Even if he had to research 100 years. If, in just four months, he turns his theory completely, he is just going to get embarrassed.
Last edited by equirhodont; 05/19/201809:01 AM.
I´m the author of the book "SS-Totenkopfring Himmleruv prsten cti" www.totenkopfring.eu
