Originally Posted by wotan
Originally Posted by Gerrit1963
Wotan it was a different number, i didnt even noticed it untill i sold it, the buyer was the one that saw it.
Here is a picture of it, a Horster marked one.
Best,Ger


Hello Gerrit, thank you very much for your quick reply. The different numbers make clear that it is no "part number". The relativly high number let me question the possibility of a "working place" number, but as a dagger serial number imho can be obliterated the "working place" number remains.

If I remember correct, H?RSTER did some kind of serial numbering on very early Heer daggers?

Thank you for showing!

Regards,



Guys, thank you for your comments!

wotan, you are right, initial H?RSTER Heer daggers was internally numbered. Back I had two numbered H?RSTER dagger in my collection. Sold one to a friend collector and still have the dagger numbered "1" on the tang the pommel and the crossguard.

Photos.

Janos

a.jpg (139.94 KB, 69 downloads)
b.jpg (119.77 KB, 68 downloads)
c.jpg (116.1 KB, 68 downloads)
d.jpg (117.23 KB, 68 downloads)
e.jpg (101.74 KB, 68 downloads)