|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,097 Likes: 99
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,097 Likes: 99 |
Doug,
Probably Eickhorn. Or another major supplier of SA. If they took the dagger apart and re-did the blade reverse, it would look 100% perfect. I have seen quite a few of these. They were Eicks because of the upper scabbard fitting, or the bench number, or the CG marks.
|
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
SA Dagger, no RZM or maker mark?
|
Karl S.
|
01/21/2017 09:31 PM
|
|
Re: SA Dagger, no RZM or maker mark?
|
Dave
|
01/22/2017 12:01 AM
|
|
Re: SA Dagger, no RZM or maker mark?
|
Karl S.
|
01/22/2017 12:46 AM
|
|
Re: SA Dagger, no RZM or maker mark?
|
Larry C
|
01/25/2017 02:20 AM
|
|
Re: SA Dagger, no RZM or maker mark?
|
Dave
|
01/25/2017 03:22 AM
|
|
Re: SA Dagger, no RZM or maker mark?
|
Larry C
|
02/04/2017 12:30 AM
|
|
Re: SA Dagger, no RZM or maker mark?
|
Dave
|
02/04/2017 03:52 AM
|
|
Re: SA Dagger, no RZM or maker mark?
|
kingtiger
|
02/10/2017 05:49 AM
|
|
SA Dagger, no RZM or maker mark?
|
Vassago
|
03/25/2017 08:07 PM
|
|
Re: SA Dagger, no RZM or maker mark?
|
Skynyrd
|
03/26/2017 02:14 AM
|
|
Re: SA Dagger, no RZM or maker mark?
|
Dave
|
03/26/2017 02:46 AM
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics31,672
Posts329,141
Members7,527
| |
Most Online5,900
Dec 19th, 2019
|
|
|
|
