It's far away from good copy, but killer features is that this is die struck ring and nicely done engraving
It's not supposed to be a 'copy', meaning detailed reproduction/fake. It's supposed to be a modern original piece of finest craftsmanship that is immediately recognizable as NOT being a contemporary honor ring. One more reason why I asked Hapur to add his signature inside the ring. Anybody seeing 'Made by Richards Purmnalis' and '1.III.2016' MIGHT get the hint that this one was not made by Gahr in the 30's or 40s. As Gaspare said: these will be collector's items of their own right in the future, no doubt. :-) Mark
