BTW Dave, that part that I posted from Kelly Hicks was his actual reply to my email. Honestly I don't see the reason why you had to remove it and put a note on the post that "Mr. Hicks can speak for himself." He was also referring to one of his books where he has his thought about champagne runes written down.
If I was taking his good name through the mud then yeah, I'd completely understand why the post got removed. In this case it wasn't.
Gruess,
Gerry
