We should see it but i am sceptical, because of the codes, the letter codes were assigned from Army, by Alcoso commerzial is other situation. When 43fnj and cof 43 are marked with WaA519 on pommels its going through the army WaA system, so it could go to SS, but it should be not stamped this way, only by rework. Without seing it is hard to tell anything.
You should look to Gunboard forum, there is Scott B. as really experts on DH marked rifles.
I believe here should be return to beginn, and ask why are the rework rifles stamped with DH, what means this stamp, its property, issue, unit linked or proof stamp? There exist many KZ rifles with one rune, and no DH why? In the new book of Mike Steves and Bruce Karem " Kriegsmodell K98k" there is other interesting information about certainly production of KZL.
The stamping of bayonets are not important or typical, and that why they are in focus of fakers. As mentioned earlier the real SS bayonets are blankos. Without any markings.There is confirmed to sample that WKC produced bayonets for SS, same as Alcoso,P.Weyersberg delivered to Police with proper acceptance. As there are typical production markings, we could say that the production run side by side with army orders, so WKC commerzial for SS and in same year for Army under cvl code.best regards,Andy
Last edited by AndyB; 11/20/2010 08:47 PM.
