#94945
03/24/2006 05:12 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 136
|
OP
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 136 |
I would like an opinion on this bucle - is this good or bad?
I also noticed there is two versions of police bucle - one piece stamped and the bucle with two piece construction - which one would be more rare?
|
|
|
#94946
03/24/2006 05:20 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 136
|
|
OP
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 136 |
|
|
|
#94947
03/24/2006 05:21 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 136
|
|
OP
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 136 |
|
|
|
#94948
03/24/2006 05:22 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 136
|
|
OP
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 136 |
|
|
|
#94949
03/24/2006 03:56 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 441
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 441 |
The SchuPo buckle that you have posted looks perfectly fine to me.
Introduced in 1936 and yours is by the well known Richard Sieper und Sohne. The lettering and the ampersand to the R S & S logo looks a little eccentric, although a characteristic often seen for this particular maker.
There are many "variations" to this still quite common buckle and as you suggest, the buckle is known with a seperate tabbed roundel. I do not think though one can be regarded as rarer than the other and again, there are so many obvious and sublime variations to this group of buckles.
Regards,
David
|
|
|
#94950
03/24/2006 09:20 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 136
|
|
OP
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 136 |
David, thank you very much for such imformative answer! I'll try to get the buckle for my Schuma display.
|
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics31,667
Posts329,033
Members7,517
| |
Most Online5,900
Dec 19th, 2019
|
|
|
|
