#90822
11/29/2008 10:54 PM
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,344
|
OP
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,344 |
next up for your consideration is a very nice inf off visor,,what about this one,thumbs up or down?..thanks to all who respond,,Robert
|
|
|
#90823
11/29/2008 10:55 PM
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,344
|
|
OP
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,344 |
|
|
|
#90824
11/29/2008 10:56 PM
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,344
|
|
OP
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,344 |
|
|
|
#90825
11/29/2008 10:57 PM
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,344
|
|
OP
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,344 |
|
|
|
#90826
11/30/2008 10:09 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 724
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 724 |
Any makers marks impressed in the leather sweatband?
A complete lack of makers marks is unusual for officer's caps (because they were all tailor made). Yellow lining with no makers marks is usually other ranks (because they were generally issued, and made in bulk on government contracts), but this does not have the usual tellerform shape of such caps.
David!
|
|
|
#90827
11/30/2008 03:29 PM
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,344
|
|
OP
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,344 |
i have been looking closely at the last pic or the interior of the hat,,it seems to me that i can just barely make out the edge line of a sweat diamond,,,does anyone else see that,,and the area to slip a name tag in the slot of the diamond?..Robert
|
|
|
#90828
11/30/2008 05:45 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,480
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,480 |
The interior is commensurate with what I would expect to see as is the underside of the visor.
I think it is really very difficult to be certain with anything these days without an in hand inspection unless the source is reputable.
War is when your government tells you who the enemy is.
Revolution is when you figure it out for yourself.
|
|
|
#90829
11/30/2008 10:03 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 724
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 724 |
Robert,
I see the area you are talking about. It looks like there was once a sweat diamond there, of the right format. But still, ask the seller if there are any impressions in the sweatband.
This sort of piece needs careful examination.
David!
|
|
|
#90830
11/30/2008 11:15 PM
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,344
|
|
OP
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,344 |
hi all,,,many thanks for your observations and knowledgeable statements...Robert
|
|
|
#90831
12/13/2008 02:14 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 445
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 445 |
Robert, another thing to look for is cross hatching impressions on the underside of the visor.This seems to be an important characteristic of period caps. Good luck!
|
|
|
#90832
12/13/2008 02:51 AM
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,344
|
|
OP
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,344 |
thanks bill,,,will do,,,Robert
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 130
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 130 |
Could be EM with addition of chin cord cap looks OK timothy
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,977 Likes: 33
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,977 Likes: 33 |
This is a good period piece from the pictures provided. No issues here. It is possible that it has been upgraded to officer status but one would have to examine the cap in order to determine. It was not entirely un common practice, especially if it was an officer grade material NCO visor cap. cheers and regards, Ryan
|
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics31,680
Posts329,314
Members7,543
| |
Most Online5,900
Dec 19th, 2019
|
|
|
7 members (Mikee, Don Scowen, Vern, Mauser88, Documentalist, atis, ollar),
93
guests, and
206
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
