#88956
12/24/2008 05:16 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,808 Likes: 3
|
OP
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,808 Likes: 3 |
|
|
|
#88957
12/25/2008 03:19 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 454
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 454 |
Nice article, but it's hard for me to believe. But then again, anything is possible. One thing I'm convinced of concerning the Kennedy assination is that there was more than one shooter. I will never believe that Oswald did it alone. Also, I could never understand why, all the major allied leaders were so afraid of Stalin. From Truman on down, no one wanted to offend Stalin. His a** should have been kicked back to Moskow. Sorry, I'm getting off the subject. Thanks for a great article. Much food for thought.
|
|
|
#88958
12/25/2008 04:24 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 200
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 200 |
Oh, to think of all the trees that died for paper to print such rubbish.
|
|
|
#88959
12/27/2008 09:03 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,321
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,321 |
Conspericy theory in my opnion nothing more, anything is possible but unlikely. Don't know if it's true or not but in the movie patton mentioned that the U.S. should keep moving across to the Pacific or something like that. Think how different this world would be if we did. Heck we had the Bomb. I do know a friend and former employee said that when he was in the rainbow division at the end of the war that they were told not to let the russians get too close as they would ask to see their weapon and in turn shoot the u.s. soldier. This actually happened was my first thought, then why didn't we just go stright across to the pacific was my second thought, maybe Patton was right.He also added that Patton was a son of a B****, but would serve with him anytime in battle.
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics31,671
Posts329,129
Members7,525
|
Most Online5,900 Dec 19th, 2019
|
|
11 members (Dean Perdue, Jonesy, LotusPeddler96, George Sr., Dave, Eric26, Vern, Tanker, Luftbud, Mikee, Documentalist),
569
guests, and
122
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|