#69221
12/09/2006 09:14 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,199 Likes: 2
|
OP
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,199 Likes: 2 |
On this dagger once there was a maker mark, but for any reason of it have very accurately removed (I guess, that it for the reason  )) But nevertheless who has made this dagger? Whether it is possible to define the maker to any attributes?
|
|
|
#69222
12/09/2006 09:15 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,199 Likes: 2
|
|
OP
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,199 Likes: 2 |
|
|
|
#69223
12/09/2006 09:16 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,199 Likes: 2
|
|
OP
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,199 Likes: 2 |
|
|
|
#69224
12/09/2006 09:18 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,199 Likes: 2
|
|
OP
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,199 Likes: 2 |
|
|
|
#69225
12/09/2006 09:19 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,199 Likes: 2
|
|
OP
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,199 Likes: 2 |
|
|
|
#69226
12/09/2006 09:55 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,024 Likes: 1
|
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,024 Likes: 1 |
|
|
|
#69227
12/09/2006 09:59 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,871 Likes: 6
|
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,871 Likes: 6 |
|
|
|
#69228
12/09/2006 11:35 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 275
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 275 |
Looking at the almost delicate shape of the grip, I'd also say E.P.& S. It's been my experience that many Pack scabbards didn't "hold" the browning process very well.
"The mission of this Allied Force was fulfilled at 0241, local time, May 7th, 1945," Dwight D. Eisenhower
|
|
|
#69229
12/10/2006 10:07 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,199 Likes: 2
|
|
OP
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,199 Likes: 2 |
Thanks. I too have thought about this maker. But me has confused, that in Fisher's feference at this maker it is not specified Sw.
|
|
|
#69230
12/10/2006 11:05 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 961
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 961 |
As for the removed maker mark > wouldn't it make sense that it was removed together with something else ? Removing the Rohm dedication to leave only this bottom fragment.. Distance to crossguard would be the key here , and IMO it is correct for having had an inscription . This also supports the Pack manufacture .
|
|
|
#69231
12/11/2006 04:31 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,054
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,054 |
Yep, Pack. Even the scabbard fittings indicate E. Pack as the maker.
John
|
|
|
#69232
12/11/2006 12:51 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,024 Likes: 1
|
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,024 Likes: 1 |
I've seen several examples where Fisher's reference does not match what is found in the field. This is a good example. Everything I see here screams "Pack". The crossguards, the grip, the eagle, and the scabbard. One thing I really appreciate about John is that if you email him with solid evidence he will revise his reference for the next edition.
|
|
|
#69233
12/11/2006 06:56 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,377
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,377 |
IMO Pack screams at you. Seiler (Yank in UK) 
|
|
|
#69234
12/11/2006 07:08 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 149
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 149 |
Pack. I had one just like this until recently. Identical crossguards, grip, and worn scabbard finish.
Got Lugers?
|
|
|
#69235
12/11/2006 07:18 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 842
|
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 842 |
is that part of the makers mark directly above the SW mark? Looks like a 'WC'...?
|
|
|
#69236
12/11/2006 09:03 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,199 Likes: 2
|
|
OP
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,199 Likes: 2 |
|
|
|
#69237
12/12/2006 12:29 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 961
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 961 |
Not WC , but the middle part of " soliNGen " ? On mine , grinding of the dedication took off the left half of the figure ..
|
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics31,673
Posts329,159
Members7,530
| |
Most Online5,900
Dec 19th, 2019
|
|
|
|
![[Linked Image from germandaggers.com]](http://www.germandaggers.com/minibanners/lst.jpg)
