#68204
01/19/2006 06:11 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 693
|
OP
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 693 |
gentlemen i am assuming that this handle is no good?the eagle doesnt look right to me and i have compared it to some of mine.also the roundel doesnt seem right either,turned the opposite way and thick runes.am i correct?
thanks
mark
|
|
|
#68205
01/19/2006 06:13 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 693
|
|
OP
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 693 |
|
|
|
#68206
01/19/2006 06:14 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 693
|
|
OP
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 693 |
|
|
|
#68207
01/19/2006 06:15 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 693
|
|
OP
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 693 |
|
|
|
#68208
01/19/2006 06:16 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 693
|
|
OP
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 693 |
i forgot to mention the sharp ridge on the handle,is this also right?
thanks
mark
|
|
|
#68209
01/19/2006 07:20 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 100
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 100 |
Agreed, the eagle does'nt llok right to me either. I looked in Tom Wittman's SS book at the known variations just to be sure, no match there.The roundel seems strange as well. The sigrunnen spacing seem too close together, again compared to known examples. The chipping or gouging around the roundel only adds to mystery so to speak.
George
GDC # 0191
|
|
|
#68210
01/19/2006 07:23 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 100
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 100 |
I forgot to ask : What does the bore for the blade tang look like ?
GDC # 0191
|
|
|
#68211
01/19/2006 07:27 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 693
|
|
OP
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 693 |
i dont have a pic of the bore,but i do have a pic of an sa handle from the same person with an eagle that looks the same???
thanks
mark
|
|
|
#68212
01/19/2006 07:29 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 693
|
|
OP
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 693 |
|
|
|
#68213
01/19/2006 07:31 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 693
|
|
OP
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 693 |
repros from the same maker?i just noticed that there is a cast mark above the beak on both birds?never seen this before.
thanks
mark
|
|
|
#68214
01/19/2006 09:37 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 100
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 100 |
That could very well be the case. I have looked at the political pieces I own, and do not have any that are like this. IMO, to have two of these offered by the same individual is too much for coincidence. The bore for the tang should be squared off ( more rectangular )on the bottom of the grip, that is why I asked. There should also be depressions, however slight they may be to the grip wher the crossgaurds were mounted, assuming they are used originals. I'm sure somewhere in this hobby are original daggers, parts, ect that have not been seen before. I would be very apprehensive about purchasing these however if that is your intention.
George
GDC # 0191
|
|
|
#68215
01/20/2006 12:53 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 938
|
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 938 |
That is a fake grip, fake runes and eagle.
|
|
|
#68216
01/20/2006 05:55 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 693
|
|
OP
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 693 |
thanks guy's,i thought as much but as we all know things pop up that that prove to be different than what we are used to and are sometimes ok.i didnt feel good about these.
thank you
mark
|
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics31,678
Posts329,301
Members7,539
| |
Most Online5,900
Dec 19th, 2019
|
|
|
9 members (Documentalist, Baz69, Dave, AnatoliyD, ed773, Stephen, Gaspare, Nietzsche, atis),
96
guests, and
191
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
