#43020
11/08/2009 12:26 PM
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,344
|
OP
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,344 |
would like to hear your thoughts and opinions on these aswell,,,Robert
|
|
|
#43021
11/08/2009 02:22 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,426
|
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,426 |
close ups from the AH one would help, but I assume it is a repro. For the bottom one it look so far OK. But to go really 100% you need better photos.
|
|
|
#43022
11/08/2009 04:04 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 3,439
|
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 3,439 |
As usual, I concur with Roberts assessment.
|
|
|
#43023
11/08/2009 10:32 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 408
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 408 |
I also agree with Robert and Jerry. Top one seems to be a fake BeVo LAH and the bottom is very very likely an original. A common band but nevertheless an original.
IMO every SS collector should get one of these Allg SS cuff titles just to learn what an original SS band looks like. The weave pattern remain the same for all later RZM woven cuffs.
//Felix
|
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics31,695
Posts329,191
Members7,531
| |
Most Online5,900
Dec 19th, 2019
|
|
|
|
