|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,421 Likes: 3
|
OP
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,421 Likes: 3 |
Please see attached pictures of the two I have. If any interest in more photos let me know. Both Eickhorn
1.JPG (52.17 KB, 132 downloads) 2.JPG (87.71 KB, 132 downloads)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,062 Likes: 34
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,062 Likes: 34 |
Railroad-Water-Protectionpolice leader daggers are easily the rarest or at least between the rarest III Reich daggers. This said it is a fact that we know very few about these daggers. Due to my knowledge (which I can kind of proof) about these daggers it should be gilded for all grades, therefore I personally do rule out the silver specimen beeing original. I know that anywhere in the net there is currently a gilded version named generals dagger of the RRWWPP but due to my observations there is no such version. We can´t take the EICKHORN sales catalog as a bible (think of the error concerning ov and diplo daggers), but in the catalog the certain dagger is shown with another crossguard than the gildded version shown here. I know (it is controersial but advanced colletors accept these as fact) EICKHOR on few occasions did use this certain crossguard as shown on the gilded version during the period. But when keeping in mind how period gilded versions of other EICKHORN daggers (or swords) do look like and how the scabbard bands of common Railroad-Protectionpolice daggers by EICKHORN do look like I dare to doubt if this is a period specimen. The pictures are not so detailed but I also would examine the scabard body itself if such kind was used by EICKHORN... Just my thoughts and my personal opinion. Regards,
wotan, gd.c-b#105
"Never look for sqare eggs" as a late owner of an original FHH-dagger used to say.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,421 Likes: 3
|
OP
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,421 Likes: 3 |
Thank you for the reply Wotan , I will get some more pictures but i will post them in the other forum relating to this dagger as this is the incorrect place for type. I will have to start a new thread in that area
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,421 Likes: 3
|
OP
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,421 Likes: 3 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,062 Likes: 34
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,062 Likes: 34 |
Hello spock, did switch the thread to the proper "Misc." forum as you wished. Regards,
wotan, gd.c-b#105
"Never look for sqare eggs" as a late owner of an original FHH-dagger used to say.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 5,147 Likes: 27
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 5,147 Likes: 27 |
Wotan’s knowledge and insight are always appreciated by me and a number of other guys here. His experience, especially with this esoteric model dagger can be of great assistance.
Personally I scrutinize these dagger as all being postwar and wait for something to jump out to me as a sign of authenticity. Probably the safest way to be with something this rare and often copied.
What jumps out to me on the gilt example is the color of the gilting itself which I’m not a fan of. Also, why would this dagger display a generic A crossguard?
GDC Gold Badge #290 GDC Silver Badge #310
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,421 Likes: 3
|
OP
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,421 Likes: 3 |
I agree, Both of these look too new even though they have been in a collection for over 30 years. I will try and get them into the hands of someone I hope will help with the decision. I will not bother posting more photos until then, if at all.
if they are copies? then i wouild not want the fakers to see the traits they messed up on.
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics31,743
Posts330,294
Members7,628
|
Most Online5,900 Dec 19th, 2019
|
|
8 members (den70, Stephen, kreta1961, Evgeniy, AnatoliyD, Dave, Jonesy, benten),
196
guests, and
35
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|