|
Joined: Jul 2023
Posts: 2
|
OP
Joined: Jul 2023
Posts: 2 |
Hello, I bought this SA ground Rohm dagger after it had come in from the son of the vet who brought it back. Trying to find out info and make sure it’s good to go… the blade is in very nice condition and the fittings are great, I appreciate everyone’s opinions on this one. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,156 Likes: 112
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,156 Likes: 112 |
Hi, Orange,
Welcome to GDC. Lots of daggers and other stuff here.
Can you post another photo if there are the remains of the Rohm dedication ?
Dave
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2023
Posts: 2
|
OP
Joined: Jul 2023
Posts: 2 |
There isn’t any remains of the dedication. Looks like it was a pretty thorough job to remove it! Do the crossguards look like Pack guards?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,156 Likes: 112
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,156 Likes: 112 |
Orange,
What I think you have here is a non-Rohm EP&S SA dagger. The trademark is too high off the guard for a Rohm dagger.
The dagger has been over cleaned. What you see covering the trademark and higher up the blade are scratches made by steel wool or something similar. It was probably used on light rust as you see at the bottom right of the blade. The grip was cleaned too. From the smooth thin remains of the scabbard finish, the son gave that a lick too.
But you do have a Pack dagger, guards and all from what I can see.
Look for a nickel silver clip to add to the short hanger.
Dave
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,156 Likes: 112
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,156 Likes: 112 |
Here is what a full ring would look like.
On the short hanger you have, you appear to be missing the clip as well as the small 'keeper'
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 816 Likes: 28
|
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 816 Likes: 28 |
That's a very nice matching set Dave. Yours, or a file photo?? One would think it would be easy to put a set together these days. I have been looking for a dark brown belt loop with RZM markings for years. Ed
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,156 Likes: 112
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,156 Likes: 112 |
It's mine, Ed. Here the picture before cropping. The one on the right has a small buckle style grip holder, which I think is an earlier variant ... but who knows ? I always thought that hangers added a lot to daggers.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 816 Likes: 28
|
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 816 Likes: 28 |
Both nice Dave. I like the buckle Grip holder. That set matched very well also. You see so many put together sets now, not worth having in my opinion. Ed
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,719 Likes: 2
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,719 Likes: 2 |
For a Pack early SA it is void of a Gruppe mark ...which should be common if this is a non Rohm.
Historical Stewardship is a Trusted Honor that must be kept!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,156 Likes: 112
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,156 Likes: 112 |
You could be right, Larry. Pack trademarks vary more than any other. As for Gruppe marks, we see a small percent of early daggers without them and speculate as to how that happened .. without an answer.
I hope the OP found a clip for his hanger
Dave
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,690 Likes: 56
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,690 Likes: 56 |
The Pack SA-dagger posted here is most likely an ex Röhm dagger, what explains why that side of the blade has all the scratches and the motto side not.
Pack Röhm SA's came with "close to the guard" and the "normal positioned" maker mark.
Second and forth daggers hereunder are also ex Röhm's with that mark.
Herman
1.JPG (112.2 KB, 47 downloads)
You never have enough HJ-knifes!
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics31,742
Posts330,286
Members7,628
|
Most Online5,900 Dec 19th, 2019
|
|
8 members (TRIPLE T, Nietzsche, AnatoliyD, chevalier2022, Seppi, Evgeniy, Sasha, jean),
172
guests, and
34
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|