|
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,199 Likes: 2
|
OP
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,199 Likes: 2 |
Here is a dagger. Lots of controversial stuff.
30.jpg (116.68 KB, 124 downloads) 31.jpg (116.57 KB, 122 downloads) 32.jpg (109.44 KB, 122 downloads) 34.jpg (87.3 KB, 122 downloads)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,199 Likes: 2
|
|
OP
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,199 Likes: 2 |
next
35.jpg (98.04 KB, 121 downloads) 36.jpg (150.94 KB, 121 downloads) 43.jpg (94.44 KB, 121 downloads) 44.jpg (93.87 KB, 121 downloads)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,199 Likes: 2
|
|
OP
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,199 Likes: 2 |
next
45.jpg (96.96 KB, 122 downloads) 51.jpg (191.86 KB, 121 downloads) 53.jpg (109.88 KB, 121 downloads) 50.jpg (112.78 KB, 121 downloads)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 5,130 Likes: 24
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 5,130 Likes: 24 |
This one doesn’t look period at all. Blade buffer is ill shaped and incorrect. Lower crossguard appears to have an SA Gruppe mark. Maker mark looks off as does the blade motto. Can’t see the top grip but my sense is it’s a repurposed SA grip. I wouldn’t go near this one.
GDC Gold Badge #290
GDC Silver Badge #310
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,917 Likes: 5
|
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,917 Likes: 5 |
MAX CHARTER MEMBER
LIFE MEMBER OVMS
|
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics31,667
Posts329,017
Members7,516
| |
Most Online5,900
Dec 19th, 2019
|
|
|
|
