|
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 101
|
OP
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 101 |
Just asking to expert if this dagger is original:
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,174 Likes: 119
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,174 Likes: 119 |
Some parts are authentic, some are not. We'd need more pictures to be certain, but this is what I see:
Blade: Probably bad. The trademark is too far off the crossguard and does not look correct.
Grip: Not Eickhorn early production.
Guards: Not Eickhorn early production. Maybe later EP&S
Tang nut: Probably fake, Maybe early EP&S
Scabbard: Real, but a Later RZM scabbard reworked with an unlikely 'motorcycle' finish
Hanger: Fake. Maybe clip anf buckle are real ?
Don't buy this ... or get a refund
Dave
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,703 Likes: 58
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,703 Likes: 58 |
I agree with Dave: this is a fabrication, the blade is not authentic and it represents 95 % of the value of such a dagger.
Herman
You never have enough HJ-knifes!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 101
|
OP
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 101 |
Thanks What kind of pictures would you want to see ?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,174 Likes: 119
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,174 Likes: 119 |
Hello, OWN,
I'd like to see a close up of the trademark and the tang nut, and some of the hanger.
Thanks, Dave
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 101
|
OP
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 101 |
Here I tried to get some Regards
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 826 Likes: 29
|
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 826 Likes: 29 |
The hanger looks toooo good to be true. You just do not see that many natural leather hangers. Wish it was real.
|
1 member likes this:
kingtiger |
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,174 Likes: 119
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,174 Likes: 119 |
First the trademark.
Eickhorn first used their large double oval trademark for the first few Rohm daggers, but quickly switched to the smaller double oval trademark closer to the guard.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,174 Likes: 119
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,174 Likes: 119 |
The trademark on your dagger is too far from the guard to be the small mark and too small to be the large mark. And the squirrel looks strange.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,174 Likes: 119
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,174 Likes: 119 |
The hanger is newly made though dated 1939. The clip is marked with the Assman trademark, but the shape and proportions are not correct.
The tang nut is a later RZM nut or a fake as the early nuts were a little more rounded.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 5
|
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 5 |
Hi
The trademark was laser-etched and totally fantasy
Highlighted by red arrows
Rgds Andrew
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,722 Likes: 2
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,722 Likes: 2 |
The Rohm Dedication is a dead give away fake with a commonly seen sloppy looking script.
This is a nicely recreated postwar SA dagger with obvious details not produced during the period. Right down to the button snaps on the hanger retainer loop.
Regards Larry
Historical Stewardship is a Trusted Honor that must be kept!
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,703 Likes: 58
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,703 Likes: 58 |
The maker mark is very poorly reproduced.
At the Ciney show a couple of weeks ago, a dagger with a blade like this was offered at 1500 EUR.
You never have enough HJ-knifes!
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics31,756
Posts330,538
Members7,674
|
Most Online5,900 Dec 19th, 2019
|
|
|
|