|
|
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 480 Likes: 39
|
OP
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 480 Likes: 39 |
Finally, for today's selection is this chunky brute. It might be silver but there is no obvious mark. Thanks again for your thoughts.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,935 Likes: 31
|
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,935 Likes: 31 |
Must be from the same “maker” as the other 2. I do not think it is a period piece. Again take them as non expert thoughts- just another collectors opinion.
|
|
1 member likes this:
Stephen |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,179 Likes: 291
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,179 Likes: 291 |
Looks like it has a chance.. But the closer you look,,the more you see. The Devil is in the details. The cartouche would have hand done dapping to hold the eventual enamel which it doesn't. Inner band looks smooth but when you look to the sides you can see some faults / pitting.. Another to let someone else get..
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,436 Likes: 70
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,436 Likes: 70 |
It is not possible to determine the period of manufacture of the runes, IMO fake
|
|
1 member likes this:
Stephen |
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics31,667
Posts329,285
Members7,543
| |
Most Online5,900
Dec 19th, 2019
|
|
|
11 members (Matarese, atis, TRIPLE T, Nietzsche, Texasuberalles, Don Scowen, Stephen, Dutch Daggerman, Paul, Ric Ferrari, stingray),
127
guests, and
279
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
