|
|
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 8
|
OP
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 8 |
Hi,
I need your help! The original dagger?
Many Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 8
|
|
OP
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 8
|
|
OP
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 8
|
|
OP
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 8
|
|
OP
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,094 Likes: 99
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,094 Likes: 99 |
nrik
Sorry, But I do not think so. The grip proportions look wrong, The trademark is poorly etched and there are few signs of age.
Dave
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,610 Likes: 8
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,610 Likes: 8 |
That's a reproduction i am afraid, as stated by Dave the maker mark is poorly done also the grips are too light in colour.
The hanger looks to be original
Regards Sean
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 8
|
|
OP
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 8 |
Many thanks Dave and sean
?ric
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 5,130 Likes: 24
|
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 5,130 Likes: 24 |
Definitely a postwar RAD, sorry. I agree with Sean that the hanger might be period.
GDC Gold Badge #290
GDC Silver Badge #310
|
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics31,670
Posts329,072
Members7,519
| |
Most Online5,900
Dec 19th, 2019
|
|
|
9 members (Simone, Texasuberalles, Stirnpanzer, Documentalist, seany, Dave, Jonesy, ado, den70),
582
guests, and
143
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
