|
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 6
|
OP
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 6 |
Hello, I have an SS Dagger which I acquired about 40 years ago. I would like to present it here and let you experts tell me what the good the bad and the ugly of this specific dagger. I know it is a Robert Klaas 1939. I am attaching 18 pics. Looking forward to your feed back. Thank you, Mark
1.JPG (15.76 KB, 275 downloads) 2.JPG (63.23 KB, 276 downloads) 3.JPG (65.2 KB, 279 downloads) 4.JPG (50.12 KB, 276 downloads) 5.JPG (78.49 KB, 274 downloads)
Last edited by AZMARK777; 05/14/2020 07:13 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 6
|
OP
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 6 |
more pics
6.JPG (76.87 KB, 272 downloads) 7.JPG (70.79 KB, 272 downloads) 8.JPG (75.4 KB, 274 downloads) 9.JPG (71.02 KB, 274 downloads) 10.JPG (75.58 KB, 274 downloads)
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 6
|
OP
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 6 |
more pics
12.JPG (56.71 KB, 271 downloads) 13.JPG (53.63 KB, 272 downloads) 14.JPG (73.7 KB, 271 downloads) 15.JPG (66.8 KB, 271 downloads) 16.JPG (77.83 KB, 271 downloads)
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 6
|
OP
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 6 |
last pics
17.JPG (77.37 KB, 275 downloads) 18.JPG (84.38 KB, 274 downloads) 16.JPG (74.64 KB, 272 downloads)
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 5,552 Likes: 9
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 5,552 Likes: 9 |
It's a fake dagger completely
Last edited by JR; 05/15/2020 01:14 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 5,126 Likes: 22
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 5,126 Likes: 22 |
I'm nowhere as astute on ID'ing SS daggers and even I can see a few things that I wouldn't want on a dagger.
GDC Gold Badge #290 GDC Silver Badge #310
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 6
|
OP
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 6 |
Jr or anyone care to elaborate further? Is it 100 % non original parts? Does it have some original parts, like the scabbard perhaps? If it is completely unoriginal parts, who was making these 40 + years ago? Were there a lot of them back then?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 780 Likes: 26
|
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 780 Likes: 26 |
Mark Seems that is a hard question to get answered here. Been asked before, never really answered. Kind of a good looking dagger. If you have had this dagger that long, the "We don't want to help the fakers" thing is out the door. I'd like to know what the dagger is worth in dollers. I'd pick one up if the price was right. Good luck Ed
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 5,552 Likes: 9
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 5,552 Likes: 9 |
The grip and emblems are totally bogus. If you study the basically 4 styles of eagles in any SA or SS grip, you'll not see the one that is in this handle. The blade projects a rather sharp spinal ridge, with the motto too far down from the shoulder. The scabbard fittings are typical of what we see with the 70's produced post war reproductions produced in Spain. While Piel & Adday did make crossguard for many manufactures out of nickel, these appear poorly cast repops. Additionally, Klaas guards are usually St caster marked Even during the RZM period the fitment of the grip to crossguards are much better typically than shown with this example. The SS runes button is huge, and poorly set in the handle The trademark is a known reproduction, and not like what Klaas used. If the PA crossguards are in fact period nickel, you're not going to see them used as late as 1939, as indicated by the blade RZM Same dagger shown on WAF, and those who responded called it bad as well.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 6
|
OP
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 6 |
Well, I guess I got the ugly truth. Thank you for breaking it down for me. Mark
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics31,652
Posts328,702
Members7,501
|
Most Online5,900 Dec 19th, 2019
|
|
7 members (Nietzsche, Documentalist, benten, Vern, maybarker, Mikee, Baz69),
461
guests, and
60
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|