|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 167
|
OP
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 167 |
Dear collectors! Again I need your help! They offer this dagger, as the original is 33 years old. Buy or pass by?Thanks in advance for answers!
21.jpg (68.21 KB, 552 downloads) 22.jpg (52.73 KB, 553 downloads) 23.jpg (54.4 KB, 555 downloads) 25.jpg (51.8 KB, 552 downloads) 24.jpg (49.21 KB, 551 downloads)
Last edited by Arlih; 07/15/2018 10:52 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 167
|
OP
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 167 |
I wait for your opinions. photo only such. Help!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 77 Likes: 3
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 77 Likes: 3 |
No one is commenting? Anyway, I do not like the Eickhorn logo. But for me the dead giveaway that there is something wrong... is the perfectly laser-etched " I " gruppe mark on the reverse lower cross guard... Just my two cents.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,156 Likes: 112
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,156 Likes: 112 |
I would like to see this in hand before deciding
Who is selling this?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,077
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,077 |
The clip and buckle on the hanger look strange. Not what are usually seen on these. I see nothing wrong with the dagger, except possibly the grip has been refinished. I'm with Dave, an in-hand exam is needed.If you can make or get more and better photos, please post then, Maybe that will help.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,156 Likes: 112
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,156 Likes: 112 |
The clip and buckle are probably OK. That hanger looks like a pre-RZM style where they used clips from WWI and buckles from anywhere.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 9,436
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 9,436 |
Looks good to me. If they are making the repros this good, then it is time to throw in the towel.
robert grant
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 167
|
OP
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 167 |
I apologize for the silence ... Now I have a dagger and I can give a lot of photos. Waiting for your opinions. Thank.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 167
|
OP
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 167 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 167
|
OP
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 167 |
on the tail - there is no stigma. Could this be?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 167
|
OP
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 167 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 167
|
OP
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 167 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 167
|
OP
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 167 |
Dear collectors! Again I need your help!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 167
|
OP
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 167 |
Dear Dave! and other professionals! Say opinion on the blade and handle.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 257 Likes: 2
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 257 Likes: 2 |
The eagle of the grip seems replaced...i m not a big Expert but i don t like the Blade at all
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,156 Likes: 112
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,156 Likes: 112 |
It is real, but has been worked on.
The blade has been cleaned aggressively.
The grip seems to have been refinished and that is why it looks good but there is a residue around the eagle. The scabbard I don't know.
Dave
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 167
|
OP
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 167 |
Many thanks for the replies! Is the blade itself ... good or bad?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,032 Likes: 6
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,032 Likes: 6 |
The hilt to tip 'sideways' scratches and the lack of darkening in the letters underscore the 'cleaning' of the blade. The lack of sharpness of the contour lines on the handle indicate 'work' as well. I think the item is genuine but has been heavily 'restored'.
Potos of the scabbard would be helpful, especially the finish without the hanger and the screw heads.ame off
Kinda' like a classic car that has had a 'frame off' restoration.
Last edited by Texasuberalles; 12/07/2018 03:56 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 933
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 933 |
I do not like this blade, Regards Gerd
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,878 Likes: 7
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,878 Likes: 7 |
I don't think this grip belongs on an Eickhorn either, looks more like a Boker grip. At best a parts piece IMO
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics31,741
Posts330,271
Members7,628
|
Most Online5,900 Dec 19th, 2019
|
|
|
|