|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 422
|
OP
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 422 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 47
|
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 47 |
Hello,
Sorry to say, Nothing to do with WW2, probably made last week.
Regards
Mark
Last edited by Marky C; 01/24/2016 10:39 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 422
|
OP
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 422 |
Marky thank you very much for your answer , thank you for your help and opinion, a cordial greeting.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 47
|
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 47 |
Hi Vassago,
Just sorry for the bad news. Apologies I should have given you some reasons why I said what I did.
Tsuka (handle) - ito (wrap) doesn't seem nicely done, Menuki look like modern castings and Fuchi/kashira all look modern.
Blade - Looks a strange shape, has no features like hada, hamon and has no all round clean lines.
Nakago (tang) - has no shape, patina, file marks
Off course, I could be wrong as I'm judging off the pictures but the Nakago does it for me.
All the best
Mark
Last edited by Marky C; 01/25/2016 09:02 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,206
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,206 |
hi vassago just looking at this so called japanese ww2 sword . mark is right this sword has nothing to do with japanese ww2 swords sorry its a fake probly chinese made please take a good look at the boshi the tip of the sword its cut on an angle japanese boshis dont ever look like this also outh things mark has pointed out is not a good sign run from this sword best andy militarynut
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics31,742
Posts330,286
Members7,628
|
Most Online5,900 Dec 19th, 2019
|
|
9 members (Honestmike, Vern, TRIPLE T, Nietzsche, AnatoliyD, chevalier2022, Seppi, Evgeniy, Sasha),
175
guests, and
34
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|