|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 422
|
OP
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 422 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,084 Likes: 96
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,084 Likes: 96 |
NO, the dagger is NOT correct.
It has an RZM (later) scabbard and what looks like RZM crossguards and grip, but an early blade.
PARTS Dagger. Do not buy.
Most early SA daggers have Gau marks. Some do not. No-one knows for certain why.
Regards, Dave
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 422
|
OP
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 422 |
Thanks Dave for your reply, luckily before taking any decision I commend your judgment, and this Dagger input already brought me these doubts.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 974
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 974 |
FYI: it actually is NOT the "Gau" mark (despite what many collectors call it). It is SA Group marking and it is something different than NSDAP Gau. Sometimes the "Gau" and SA-Gruppe matches in name, but not always.
And the dagger is a parts dagger, so don't buy.
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics31,652
Posts328,702
Members7,501
|
Most Online5,900 Dec 19th, 2019
|
|
8 members (Mikee, Documentalist, Baz69, Stephen, Honestmike, Mbuin, Evgeniy, AndyRose),
491
guests, and
68
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|