|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,344
|
OP
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,344 |
what are the opinions on this item?..thanks in advance for all replies...Robert
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,281 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,281 Likes: 2 |
Robert. I was told by a long time dealer collector that there should be this flaw between the 9 and the 3! Does your have this flaw?
Rod
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,344
|
|
OP
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,344 |
there does not appear to be the flaw that you show,,so I guess this I posted is no good,,,thanks so much for the clarification,,,Robert
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,386
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,386 |
there where at least three makers so the flaw would not be in all three. What maker was your dealer referring to ? The example shown does look very crude a big red flag
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,281 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,281 Likes: 2 |
Paul. The maker is Deschler bottom arm stamped 1 the same as Roberts. Here is a shot of the maker on the original.
Rod
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,429
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,429 |
Robert. I was told by a long time dealer collector that there should be this flaw between the 9 and the 3! Does your have this flaw?
Rod this is a flaw seen on original Deschler pieces. William Kramer
|
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics31,670
Posts329,073
Members7,519
| |
Most Online5,900
Dec 19th, 2019
|
|
|
|
