|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 115
|
OP
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 115 |
Say, the original dagger?
thank you
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 115
|
|
OP
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 115 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 257 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 257 Likes: 2 |
I m not expert but i see early nickel grip fitting ( crossguard also gau marked) who don t agree with late scabbard and rzm code blade...but i think you ll have to wait for the opinions of the real experts of this forum...my opinion is insignificant
Regards
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,077
|
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,077 |
A very odd configuration. 1938 is a little late for a "mixed parts" dagger. The grip appears to be restored. I would be leery of this one. At best, it appears to be a parts dagger.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 925
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 925 |
Say, the original dagger?
thank you NO, wrong motto pattern and too far down the blade. Also the TM, particularly the numbers of the contract code Grip is a newer one  Regards, Gerd
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 115
|
|
OP
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 115 |
In my opinion the design team with the addition of copies!
thank you
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 139
|
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 139 |
Say, the original dagger?
thank you Answer on your question write on crossguard. 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 168 Likes: 7
|
|
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 168 Likes: 7 |
its for sure a parts dagger, it has a Gau marked SA daggers crossguard.
New grip,its a no good.
Runnnn
Ger
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 194
|
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 194 |
I dont like anything about this dagger , sorry .
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 974
|
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 974 |
Bad to the bone. Fake blade, fake runes, SA crossguard, handle not original SS type, repainted scabbard.
|
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics31,427
Posts325,641
Members7,323
| |
Most Online5,900
Dec 19th, 2019
|
|
|
|
