|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 865 Likes: 1
|
OP
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 865 Likes: 1 |
Hi All,
I know Dick produced rohms but I have never came across any - and now is my chance to consider a full rohm from DICK. How do you asses this SA?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 865 Likes: 1
|
|
OP
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 865 Likes: 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 416
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 416 |
BBBBBBBBBBB Bad to the bone IMO
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,129
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,717 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,717 Likes: 2 |
It would of been better off remaining a Standard SA and be worth something than to deface it with a phony inscription and make it worth less. Sad to see that happen.
Historical Stewardship is a Trusted Honor that must be kept!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,666 Likes: 52
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,666 Likes: 52 |
Not only the inscription is wrong, the orientation of the makersmark is not correct for a F. Dick R�hm dagger.
Best regards,
Herman
You never have enough HJ-knifes!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,610 Likes: 8
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,610 Likes: 8 |
So annoying to see a great dagger ruined. looks to have a beauty of a grip as well.
Regards Sean
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 801
|
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 801 |
I thought Dick had both logos on the R�hm daggers ... the vertical and the horizontal one
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,099 Likes: 102
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,099 Likes: 102 |
Yes, I agree. Both orientations.
|
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics31,686
Posts329,296
Members7,538
| |
Most Online5,900
Dec 19th, 2019
|
|
|
|
