|
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 97
|
OP
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 97 |
hello i can have this dagger today in not good condition but the dedidace Rohm is complet. can you give me your opinion please because it's for buy it. thanks karl 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 97
|
|
OP
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 97 |
the mark E.P&S 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 97
|
|
OP
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 97 |
the face side thanks 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,077
|
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,077 |
If possible, please post more and better photos of the Rohm inscription.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,615 Likes: 1
|
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,615 Likes: 1 |
If possible, please post more and better photos of the Rohm inscription. Yes. Particularly of the 'Ernst Rohm' clear close-ups. I would be careful with this one. From what little is shown, the maker mark appears almost worn away but the letter 'm' in 'Rohm' seems to be untouched.
Last edited by Serge (aka Wagner); 08/31/2010 10:31 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 97
|
|
OP
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 97 |
i have not other pics, sorry...
for me it's good dagger regraved with Rohm but i have not good experience with this type of daggers.
i have this for 1000USD
karl
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,049
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,049 |
You could buy a mint Sa by a decent maker for the same money a far better buy IMO
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 97
|
|
OP
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 97 |
i have this pics today 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,304
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,304 |
Eventhough the pictures are not all that good, the inscription is a reproduction.
Without going into details, the inscription does not have the usual characteristics that you would normally see on an original Pack.
|
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics31,669
Posts329,097
Members7,524
| |
Most Online5,900
Dec 19th, 2019
|
|
|
|
