|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 418
|
OP
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 418 |
I'm not at all sure this one is ok. Blade looks good though..
Henrik
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 418
|
|
OP
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 418 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,032
|
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,032 |
Hello, Henrik! ALL Rohm's should be maker-marked! If it is'nt, it has been ground off. The Rohm inscription looks very dark whereas the Alles fur Deutchland is very lite. Do you have a pic of the blade from the end of "Rohm" to the crossguard? Let's see what other members have to say! Regards, teufel
Never fry bacon in the nude!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 714
|
|
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 714 |
I believe it to be a reproduction. What happen to the makers trade mark?
Gailen David
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 418
|
|
OP
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 418 |
I have no idea why there is no makers mark.
Henrik
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,804
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,804 |
It might be me or it could be the photos but it seems that it could have once been a Rohm? The blade looks like it's been ground near the crossguard... can anyone else see this?
The eagle doesn't look right but that could be the lighting.
Either way, the etching has been applied again at a later date, making it a reproduction on an original piece.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,602 Likes: 6
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,602 Likes: 6 |
yes it looks previously ground then etched again that eagle looks like an alloy one to me or could be the light
Regards Sean
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,292
|
|
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,292 |
the eagle appears to be aluminum, which I have never seen on a legit Rohm. Mike
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 714
|
|
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 714 |
Mike: The eagle is the least of that daggers problem. But your right, no aluminum eagles on Rohms.
Gailen David
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,804
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,804 |
The eagle could be a replacement.
The blade appears to be a Rohm... no? With the inscription applied again at a later date.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,304
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,304 |
No doubt in my mind........100% FAKE.
If you take an original Rohm blade, you will notice that none of the letters in the word Ernst Rohm resemble any of the original ones.
Compare !
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,804
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,804 |
So you think somebody could have taken a standard SA and ground the blade a little to disguise it as a ground Rohm and then applied a dodgey inscription?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,804
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,804 |
Pat... wouldn't mind seeing more of your dagger, it looks minty.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 714
|
|
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 714 |
Yes, there is also no question in my mind that the inscription is bogus. If you have seen enough originals, this fake inscription hits you right in the face like a whipped cream pie. No need to compare this example with anything.
Gailen David
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 714
|
|
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 714 |
I am refering to the dagger that started this thread. Not your dagger Pat, which is original.
Gailen David
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 714
|
|
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 714 |
Anything is possible.
Gailen David
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M1937
by OWN - 11/27/2023 01:49 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics31,625
Posts327,832
Members7,430
| |
Most Online5,900
Dec 19th, 2019
|
|
|
7 members (C. Wetzel-20609, BretVanSant, derjager, DAGGERMAN, Eric26, ed773, JONATHAN),
396
guests, and
108
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
