|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 4
|
OP
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 4 |
the government offical daggers?
I am working on photos of a dagger that seems to be a government offical dagger, but like my recent SS dagger fake, I think this may be one also.
I will post photos soon.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,291 Likes: 2
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,291 Likes: 2 |
Alcoso I think and Eickhorn.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,072
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,072 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,094 Likes: 42
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,094 Likes: 42 |
WKC and unmarked. H�LLER has it pictured in his catalogue but I have never heard of a real original one. Regards,
wotan, gd.c-b#105
"Never look for sqare eggs" as a late owner of an original FHH-dagger used to say.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,024 Likes: 2
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,024 Likes: 2 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 4
|
OP
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 4 |
Can I email someone my pics I cannot get them to load. Maybe someone could post them for me or tell me how to "shrink them to fit"?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,072
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,072 |
Send them to "paint" if your using microsoft and use the image re-size. or drop me an email. [email protected]my mail server is goofy on my listed email. Not sure whats up with that yet. Bret Van Sant
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,072
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,072 |
Got this set of pics and am posting for m520. Bret Van Sant
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,072
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,072 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,072
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,072 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,072
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,072 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,072
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,072 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,072
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,072 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,072
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,072 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,072
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,072 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,072
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,072 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,072
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,072 |
This identical dagger is shown on pgs 114 and 115 of stephens reproduction recognition. Bret Van Sant
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,377
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,377 |
Undoubtably bad. Seiler 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,072
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,072 |
I'm not a good telling bad news kinda guy!! sorry. This is the best made of all the reproductions. I guess the big things to look for when looking at any holler. make sure the maker mark has nice sharp crisp defineable detail. And if anyone is going to buy something like this highend piece do your homework,books...books...books a link: www.militaryedgedweapons.com/DSC01885.JPGBret Van Sant
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 636
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 636 |
I agree >>>this is reproduction Holler mark looks bad too Good Holler should look like...
ALWAYS BUYING ITALIAN/ FASCIST MILITARIA > AND SOVIET DAGGERS
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 636
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 636 |
ALWAYS BUYING ITALIAN/ FASCIST MILITARIA > AND SOVIET DAGGERS
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,945
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,945 |
Ray Charles could spot this one. 
You know you're over the hill when "Happy Hour" means Nap Time
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,321
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,321 |
Always look for the detailed thermometer digets on Holler. Even the oval w/makers name is slopy ,fakes only have a few like you pictured Cog-hammer and lack detail throughout the MM. EW
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics31,798
Posts331,169
Members7,721
|
Most Online5,900 Dec 19th, 2019
|
|
7 members (Dean Perdue, Evgeniy, C. Wetzel-20609, Stephen, Jonesy, Heinrich, Agtruck),
174
guests, and
134
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|