|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 270
|
OP
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 270 |
I think most know that the Juncker 'Lazy2'(or 2 series) Knight's Cross is quite hefty in hand. Years ago that was one of the 'tests' used...among others....to determine a genuine Juncker.
The added weight, over and above the Juncker 800, L/12 was probably added to by the thinkness of the paint on these later Crosses.
It does appear to be a significant covering!
Cheers, Dave
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,023
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,023 |
Wow, that's what I call a "close up" ! 
JRS
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 270
|
OP
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 270 |
 Yes, it has become that crazy!!! One needs a loup and a laptop prior to throwing down $8 to $10k!! Of interest however, and I only now noted, is the very heavy 'texture' and particles in the paint.
Cheers, Dave
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,359
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,359 |
Dave, Man is that a good closeup! What camera do you have. Your right it's interesting to really see the texture of the paint.
Fritziii
<BR>
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 270
|
OP
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 270 |
Thanks Fritzii!!
It's just a simple Sony but utilizing 'doublers' it's next to a microscope if one has a steady hand!!!
I suspect I'm repeating my original post but the amount of bits, particles, bone? surely added to the weight...
What do others think?
Cheers, Dave
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics31,798
Posts331,169
Members7,721
|
Most Online5,900 Dec 19th, 2019
|
|
8 members (Dean Perdue, Evgeniy, C. Wetzel-20609, Stephen, Jonesy, Heinrich, Agtruck, stan),
171
guests, and
136
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|