|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,806 Likes: 13
|
|
OP
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,806 Likes: 13 |
Raymond, that 108 is a good looking piece.
--dj--Joe
<BR>
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,436
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,436 |
Nice medals Raymond! Maybe there is some dirt in the illegible one that could be removed with a toothpick?
If you've got one or more medals, please post pics and the makers mark on the ring. Also, details of any packets for the medals as well.
Updated list:
3 = Wilhelm Deumer, L�denscheid
4 = Steinhauer & L�ck, L�denscheid
6. = Fritz Zimmermann, Stuttgart
7 = Paul Meybauer, Berlin
8 = Ferdinand Hoffst�tter Bonn a. Rhein
10 = Foerster & Barth, Pforzheim
13 = Gustav Brehmer, Markneukirchen
18 = Karl Wurster, Markneukirchen
20 = C.F. Zimmermann, Pforzheim
65 = Klein & Quenzer, Idar/Oberstein
73 = Franz M�nert Gablonz
76 = Ernst L. M�ller, Pforzheim
93 = Richard Simm & S�hne, Gablonz
100 = Rudolf W�chtler & Lange, Mittwaida
107 = Carl Wild, Hamburg
108 = Arno Wallpach Metallwarenfabrik, Salzburg
110 = Otto Zappe, Gablonz
117 = Hugo Lang, Wiesenthal
127 = Moritz Hausch A.G. Pforzheim
L/15 = Otto Schickle Pforzheim
Un-marked medal with smaller than usual hanging ring
? = illegible marked medal, page 9
Others:
1 = Deschler & Sohn, M�nchen, marked packet, un-marked medal
7 = Paul Meybauer, Berlin, marked packet, marked medal
20 = C.F. Zimmermann, Pforzheim, marked packet
66 = Friedrich Keller, Oberstein, marked packet, no medal
98 = Rudolf Souval, Wien, marked packet, un-marked medal
108 = Arno Wallpach Metallwarenfabrik, Salzburg, marked packet, un-marked medal
138 = Julius Maurer, Oberstein/Nabe, marked packet with no medal description, un-marked medal
To be confirmed with pics:
14 or 74 marked medal
Regards
Russell
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2 |
Thanks Joe & Russel. I've tried cleaning it and paint like they do on firearms, no luck.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,436
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,436 |
Btt. If you've got one or more medals, please post pics and the makers mark on the ring. Also, details of any packets for the medals as well.
Regards
Russell
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 416
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 416 |
hi guys just fount this thread here are two of mine, the winter campaigns ring is unmarked and the merit with swords is marked with a 57 on the ring
thanks adam
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 416
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 416 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 416
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 416 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 416
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 416 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 416
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 416 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 333
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 333 |
This medal is marked 6 or 9 or g maybe,looks unused.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 333
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 333 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 333
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 333 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 333
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 333 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 333
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 333 |
Just read through this post very interesting,no more guessing 6 with a period.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2 |
Here's a few more I picked up. First is an unmarked one but in the packet. Unfortunately it's also unmarked.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2 |
Front of the packet. I like the way they printed the contents side ways. I wonder how many did it this way?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2 |
Front of mm#4 (Steinhauer & Luck)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2 |
Next is marked L/15 (Otto Schickle).
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2 |
Looks like #1 (Deschler & Sohn)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2 |
This last one is in the packet but the number on the medal ring isn't clear and the possibilities don't match the packets mm. Maybe they purchased the medal/packet from another company to fill an order?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2 |
The makers mark isn't perfect. At first I thought it was L/19(Ferkinand Hoffstatter) then L/12(C.E.Juncker) with the bottom of the 2 missing. The packet is marked Steinhauer & L�ck) but their LDO number is L/16. What does it look like to you guys?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2 |
|
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics31,669
Posts329,108
Members7,524
| |
Most Online5,900
Dec 19th, 2019
|
|
|
|
