|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2 |
Just remembered I had all the douments and paper work to a Unteroffizier. I checked and found another one.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2 |
Close-up, and last one. No, really I mean it this time.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,436
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,436 |
Raymond, I think it could be a 73 instead of 13. Compared with the other 13's shown, the '1' looks to be angled, not straight up and down like the others. Not sure about the other one, can you post some more pics of the number? Great medals!
If you've got one or more medals, please post pics and the makers mark on the ring. Also, details of any packets for the medals as well.
3 = Wilhelm Deumer, L�denscheid
7 = Paul Meybauer, Berlin
8 = Ferdinand Hoffst�tter Bonn a. Rhein
10 = Foerster & Barth, Pforzheim
13 = Gustav Brehmer, Markneukirchen
73 = Franz M�nert Gablonz
100 = Rudolf W�chtler & Lange, Mittwaida
107 = Carl Wild, Hamburg
110 = Otto Zappe, Gablonz
127 = Moritz Hausch A.G. Pforzheim
L/15 = Otto Schickle Pforzheim
Others:
1 = Deschler & Sohn, M�nchen, marked packet, un-marked medal
7 = Paul Meybauer, Berlin, marked packet, un-marked medal
66 = Friedrich Keller, Oberstein, marked packet, no medal
98 = Rudolf Souval, Wien, marked packet, un-marked medal
Regards
Russell
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,806 Likes: 13
|
|
OP
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,806 Likes: 13 |
 Enjoying this immensely. --dj--Joe
<BR>
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,429
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,429 |
Hello all,
Here is my 110 marked example.
William Kramer
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,429
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,429
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,429 |
Maker 110 = Otto Zappe, Gablonz.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,117
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,117 |
Ray, quite a collection thanks for sharing,here is a variant of the document....DAVE H
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,117
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,117
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2 |
Hi Dave, thanks. Nice document. I haven't seen you for awhile. Maybe I'll see you at Allentown or Tottowa. Happy New Year.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,436
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,436 |
Very nice medals and documents! Raymond, can you post a clearer pic of the number that you can't identify? Could it be a 98 or 86?
Regards
Russell
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2 |
My camera just doesn't get a good clear image that close up. I used a little white paint to try and highlight it. This is the best I could get. Looks like #65 but i'd want to see one that's unquestionably marked 65 to be sure.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2 |
Russel, I think your correct on the #73. I looked with them side by side and the 7 is angled more than the 1 on the upright part but less angled on the top part(if that makes any sence). The 3 is also shaped diferently.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,436
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,436 |
Raymond, it does look like a 65 from your pic. I enhanced the image to try and make it stand out more.
Anyone got a 65 for comparison?
Regards
Russell
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 624
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 624 |
Here is my latest medal got it at an auction today it is marked no 4. Mike
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 624
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 624 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,117
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,117 |
#117 Zimmermann..Pforzheim ????
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,117
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,117 |
Closeup m/m..........DAVE H
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,436
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,436 |
Mike, 4 = Steinhauer & L�ck, L�denscheid
Dave, 117 = Hugo Lang, Wiesenthal
Nice medals gents, keep them coming!
Regards
Russell
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,436
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,436 |
If you've got one or more medals, please post pics and the makers mark on the ring. Also, details of any packets for the medals as well.
Updated list:
3 = Wilhelm Deumer, L�denscheid
4 = Steinhauer & L�ck, L�denscheid
7 = Paul Meybauer, Berlin
8 = Ferdinand Hoffst�tter Bonn a. Rhein
10 = Foerster & Barth, Pforzheim
13 = Gustav Brehmer, Markneukirchen
73 = Franz M�nert Gablonz
100 = Rudolf W�chtler & Lange, Mittwaida
107 = Carl Wild, Hamburg
110 = Otto Zappe, Gablonz
117 = Hugo Lang, Wiesenthal
127 = Moritz Hausch A.G. Pforzheim
L/15 = Otto Schickle Pforzheim
Others:
1 = Deschler & Sohn, M�nchen, marked packet, un-marked medal
7 = Paul Meybauer, Berlin, marked packet, un-marked medal
20 = C.F. Zimmermann, Pforzheim, marked packet
66 = Friedrich Keller, Oberstein, marked packet, no medal
98 = Rudolf Souval, Wien, marked packet, un-marked medal
Regards
Russell
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,436
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,436 |
Just bringing this back again - post them if you've got them!
Regards
Russell
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2 |
Here are 3 more I picked up. First is a marked #65 in the packet. Unfortunately someone removed the name from the back of the packet.
** As usual I started taking photos and forgot that the medal came with the wrong packet. This is a "Westwall" medal packet.**
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2 |
2nd is a maker marked #93 (Richard Simm & Sohne, Gablonz). Front
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2 |
3rd is a unmarked example with the packet marked "Julius Maurer, Oberstein/Nabe" (LDO # would be 138). The strange thing is the packet doesn't have the medal name on the front.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,889 Likes: 2 |
|
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics31,669
Posts329,108
Members7,524
| |
Most Online5,900
Dec 19th, 2019
|
|
|
|
