Translate German to English - Click here to open Altavista's Babel Fish Translator Click here to learn about all those symbols by people's names.

leftlogo.jpg (20709 bytes)

Upgrade to Premium Membership

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#111096 05/02/2006 03:54 PM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,037
Likes: 4
OP Offline
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,037
Likes: 4
I've come across several ground Rohms that look to be factory ground and it looks like the motto side was also redone. The crossgraining has been reapplied but it does not look quite like the original. In addition, the motto etch and burnishing still are deep and fully frosted. What kind of process could be used to reapply crossgraining without harming the motto? Could it be that the blade was actually re-etched? Comments appreciated. Gailen if you see this post perhaps you can provide some insight.

Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 53
M
Offline
M
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 53
Suggest you contact Three Finger Louie - he did some magnificient work for my daggers following Katrina.

Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,037
Likes: 4
OP Offline
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,037
Likes: 4
Mike... that's not my question. I would like to know about period work. Thanks anyway.

Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,069
Likes: 90
Offline
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,069
Likes: 90
In the original process, I think it went this way:

1. Blank blade is semi-finished
2. Blade is acid-etched
3. "Burnishing" agent is swabbed on both sides.The burnishing agent not onlt fills the motto, the trademark and any inscription, but is also between the letters of the motto.
4. The "final grind" takes off the burmishing agent on the surface, leaving it in the motto, etc. It also leave those fine lines called crossgrain.

**************************

When daggers were sent back to the factory, all the worker had to do was hold the back of the blade on that same grinding wheel for a few extra seconds and - presto- no inscription. Sometimes they got the trademark too Big Grin

The from of the blade was not touched during this process.

Dave

Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,037
Likes: 4
OP Offline
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,037
Likes: 4
Dave I am interested to see your proof that the motto side of the blade was not touched.

Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 2
Offline
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 2
I wonder if measuring the width on a re-cossgained model vs a normal ground Rohm would indicate if the motto had side had been done? were blade widths mostly the same??


GDC silver member #393
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,037
Likes: 4
OP Offline
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,037
Likes: 4
This Hammesfahr has been ground partially taking the trademark as you can see in this photo.

MVC-012F.jpg (72.29 KB, 206 downloads)
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,037
Likes: 4
OP Offline
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,037
Likes: 4
Same dagger. You can see that the motto side has been regrained but the motto remains with crisp edges and untouched burnishing. Unquestionably, some Rohms were reworked on both sides. I just would like to know what process was used. Bill Shea also has an SS Rohm dagger that he describes as having the crossgraining reapplied to both sides of the blade.

MVC-020S.JPG (36.46 KB, 205 downloads)
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,069
Likes: 90
Offline
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,069
Likes: 90
No proof at all, but the ground daggers that I think were factory reground show no signs of reworking the front of the blade. Why would they bother ?

I have seen lots of daggers that, because of the looks of the work done, I think are amateur jobs. Maybe those guys gave the front of the blade a pass as well.

Then there are blades that have been resurfaced in modern times to get rid of surface blemishes like rust or water stains and that would require that both sides be treated.

Then there are original blades that could have been humped up in modern times with a Rohm signature that were reground because the results fooled no one.

Dave

Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,028
Likes: 5
Offline
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,028
Likes: 5
1. Blank blade is semi-finished
2. Blade is acid-etched
3. "Burnishing" agent is swabbed on both sides.The burnishing agent not onlt fills the motto, the trademark and any inscription, but is also between the letters of the motto.
4. The "final grind" takes off the burmishing agent on the surface, leaving it in the motto, etc. It also leave those fine lines called crossgrain.


I'm confused on the motto and other markings including trademarks.

How did they get etched in the blade? Something about a wax template?


Link Copied to Clipboard
Popular Topics(Views)
2,259,928 SS Bayonets
1,759,358 Teno Insignia Set
1,127,302 westwall rings
Latest New Threads
Crossguard questions
by survivaledge - 02/29/2024 06:41 PM
Gerber MK2 1974
by BretVanSant - 02/28/2024 11:57 AM
Bulgarian Brannik youth knife - real?
by Chiska - 02/26/2024 08:27 PM
artificial ivory grip
by sellick8302@rogers.com - 02/25/2024 03:36 PM
HR on Rats auction
by Gaspare - 02/24/2024 01:04 PM
Latest New Posts
HR on Rats auction
by sellick8302@rogers.com - 03/01/2024 02:43 AM
Crossguard questions
by survivaledge - 02/29/2024 11:35 PM
MUNICH badge
by derjager - 02/29/2024 05:24 PM
Gerber MK2 1974
by ed773 - 02/29/2024 02:54 PM
2nd Model Luftwaffe by Tiger
by sellick8302@rogers.com - 02/29/2024 03:34 AM
Forum Statistics
Forums42
Topics31,626
Posts328,382
Members7,488
Most Online5,900
Dec 19th, 2019
Who's Online Now
6 members (Stephen, The_Collector, polop, Documentalist, AntonGrabbe, survivaledge), 302 guests, and 90 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5