|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740
|
OP
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740 |
Is it correct for a chained 36?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740
|
OP
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740
|
OP
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740
|
OP
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740
|
OP
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740
|
OP
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740
|
OP
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740
|
OP
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740
|
OP
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740
|
OP
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,037 Likes: 4
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,037 Likes: 4 |
The seven circle mark on the tang is a known marking that has been seen on Klittermann & Moog EM 33's, unmarked M 36's and I believe some NPEA daggers. It may also appear on some SA's, but to this date it is an unknown forge. Can we see the rest of your dagger?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740
|
OP
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740 |
Here are some pictures of the dagger. My concern is the blade. Is it original? Is the interior space of the cross guard supposed to be marked?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740
|
OP
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740
|
OP
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740
|
OP
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,037 Likes: 4
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,037 Likes: 4 |
Not all crossguards are marked internally, so that wouldn't concern me too much. I think the blade is original based upon the tang marking. I see nothing else in your photos to indicate otherwise. What is it that makes you concerned?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740
|
OP
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740 |
Just wanted to make sure it was not a Raddick blade or something else. Thank you for the help
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 228
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 228 |
Looks OK for me. In my practise the interior of M36 type2 CGs usually marked P.A. Based on examing 6-7 examples. Have anyone noticed the motto is a little bit off-centered? Notice the 1st "e" in Meine and the last "e" in True... But anyway I like it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 974
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 974 |
Nice dagger! I see no red flags.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 126
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 126 |
Looks like early ni-sil fittings. One screw center fitting for the early painted units. The paint looks original and much laquer left. This is one of the most desirable variations of the chained ss pieces. The only problem I can see is that it is not at my home with its buddies.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 7,229 Likes: 1
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 7,229 Likes: 1 |
There is nothing wrong with this dagger that I can see. A very nice piece.
MAX & OVMS Life Member, MAX Bd. of Experts. GDC Platinum Dealer. Collector since 1955.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,244 Likes: 1
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,244 Likes: 1 |
Are there any dead giveaways to reddick blades?
Bob
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740
|
OP
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740 |
About Sokol's comment on the MOTTO being off center?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,037 Likes: 4
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,037 Likes: 4 |
The motto doesn't look "off center" to me. Even if it runs up or down the blade a bit it is no big deal. The templates were hand applied. It is not uncommon to see a motto that is not exactly on center. Some originals are really skewed. Nonetheless, they are still original.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 228
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 228 |
I also don't think this is a red flag. Just wanted to point the attention of fellow collectors.
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics31,672
Posts329,132
Members7,528
|
Most Online5,900 Dec 19th, 2019
|
|
7 members (AfterMath, maybarker, The_Collector, Don Scowen, Vik, jean, Documentalist),
494
guests, and
54
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|