#82937
01/03/2007 06:21 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740
|
OP
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740 |
Opinions on this latest arrival
|
|
|
#82938
01/03/2007 06:22 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740
|
OP
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740 |
|
|
|
#82939
01/03/2007 06:22 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740
|
OP
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740 |
|
|
|
#82940
01/03/2007 06:23 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740
|
OP
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740 |
|
|
|
#82941
01/03/2007 06:24 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740
|
OP
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740 |
|
|
|
#82942
01/03/2007 06:25 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740
|
OP
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740 |
|
|
|
#82943
01/03/2007 06:25 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740
|
OP
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740 |
|
|
|
#82944
01/03/2007 06:26 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740
|
OP
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740 |
|
|
|
#82945
01/03/2007 06:27 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740
|
OP
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740 |
|
|
|
#82946
01/03/2007 06:28 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740
|
OP
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740 |
|
|
|
#82947
01/03/2007 08:22 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,316
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,316 |
Looks like a GREAT piece to me!!!!! Congrats!!!
Silver Badge #0398 My Avatar = My dagger security system!
|
|
|
#82948
01/03/2007 09:08 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,023 Likes: 31
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,023 Likes: 31 |
Looks like a once broken away and newly fixed swaz� (dagger original) to me!!!!!
Can you show us the reverse of this certain part?
Personally the hangers do look spurious to me. Cogwheel opening too wide, backing different to those originals I know and slides slightly different to those originals I know. Front brocade material could be ok, perhaps of original surplus brocade material sold by a major dealer?
wotan, gd.c-b#105
"Never look for sqare eggs" as a late owner of an original FHH-dagger used to say.
|
|
|
#82949
01/04/2007 12:35 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 5,134 Likes: 24
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 5,134 Likes: 24 |
I believe Wotan is right, a period dagger that has at one point been denazified and repaired. Nice looking dagger otherwise. I can't say about the hangers. How's the pricetag?
GDC Gold Badge #290 GDC Silver Badge #310
|
|
|
#82950
01/04/2007 01:12 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740
|
OP
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740 |
Excellent eye. What would be the value of this dagger from a private purchase?
|
|
|
#82951
01/04/2007 01:14 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740
|
OP
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740 |
|
|
|
#82952
01/04/2007 01:15 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740
|
OP
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740 |
|
|
|
#82953
01/04/2007 01:23 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 7,229 Likes: 1
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 7,229 Likes: 1 |
There are some other things too. The font on the numbers is quite different on the dagger compared to the scabbard. Also some of the cogs on the wheel of the hangers look distorted. Different colored slides are also a bit disturbing-and the type of upper hanger fitting is not typical for TENO.
MAX & OVMS Life Member, MAX Bd. of Experts. GDC Platinum Dealer. Collector since 1955.
|
|
|
#82954
01/04/2007 01:52 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740
|
OP
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740 |
What would be its value "private" , without hangers?
|
|
|
#82955
01/04/2007 08:53 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,023 Likes: 31
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,023 Likes: 31 |
Houston, I do own and have seen a lot of doubtless original/from-the-period TN leader daggers, mostly with stamped numbers. Interestingly, these I have seen (with stamped numbers) ALWAYS had different fonts used on the scabbard versus used on the blade. I often did wonder myself about it. Personally I have no proof for my theses but I think the numbers did wear much faster on the hard steel of the blade contrary to the relatively "soft" iron of the scabbard mouth. So different sets (i cannot explain why also with different fonts but perhaps the more plain look was easier to cut out of the special hardened steel?) were made. Otherwise I would have no explanation but the differing is a fact. But I think vesuvio�s dagger is totally original aside from the once broken swaz�. The hangers I think is a postwar copy out of the reasons I and Houston did state. Personally i would not want a dagger with a once broken swaz�, how good it is restaurated. Quality and condition (beside historic value and rareness) are the cornerpoints in our field of collection.I would guess 1000-1500 USD at it�s absolute highest. vesuvio, I could see the certain flaw only becaus of your wonderful sharp and extremely detailed pics. Here we see how valuable such carefully made pics are in our hobby and in our forum!
wotan, gd.c-b#105
"Never look for sqare eggs" as a late owner of an original FHH-dagger used to say.
|
|
|
#82956
01/04/2007 09:56 PM
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
It is not clear exactly how the broken swaz was reattached but since the metal is aluminum I would assume the repair was carried out using epoxy. In this case the fix is weak and will not last.
|
|
|
#82957
01/05/2007 08:21 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 106
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 106 |
hello vesuvio good dolch ,but the crossguard is repair and the hanger for me are DOUBTFUL! 50%for the price! best regards patrick
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics31,671
Posts329,130
Members7,525
|
Most Online5,900 Dec 19th, 2019
|
|
8 members (Vern, Tanker, Dean Perdue, Jonesy, LotusPeddler96, George Sr., Dave, Eric26),
552
guests, and
113
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|