#78890
07/05/2008 03:56 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 44
|
OP
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 44 |
Gentlemen, your opinions please on the attached M40 single decal SS I'm considering purchasing. I have more pictures of decal and interior. Many Thanks
|
|
|
#78891
07/05/2008 04:15 PM
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 312
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 312 |
Bryan
|
|
|
#78892
07/05/2008 04:19 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 44
|
|
OP
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 44 |
Only of the decal and the interior I'm afraid; here's the decal
|
|
|
#78893
07/05/2008 04:28 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 44
|
|
OP
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 44 |
...and the interior (chinstrap looks like a replacement)
|
|
|
#78894
07/06/2008 12:34 AM
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,948
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,948 |
Let it go. Except for the shell it's a complete repro.
Cheers,
Darryl
|
|
|
#78895
07/06/2008 10:00 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 44
|
|
OP
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 44 |
Thanks Daryl. I'd be interested to know if any particular reason stands out. I had my doubts.
Thanks for your input
|
|
|
#78896
07/06/2008 12:18 PM
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,948
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,948 |
KMr,
The decal is a well known modern repro of a CA Pocher decal. Also, the chinstrap and liner are both modern repros. The liner has that "waxy" look to it, which is the tell-tale sign. And finally, the paint looks like a recent application. Sorry I can't be more specific here on a public forum but rest assured that it is bad and is something to stay away from.
Cheers,
Darryl
|
|
|
#78897
07/07/2008 06:27 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 44
|
|
OP
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 44 |
Thanks Daryl, Much appreciated.
|
|
|
#78898
07/07/2008 06:15 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 468
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 468 |
Nice to see you back again. Darryl
Thanks Joe Semen
|
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics31,674
Posts329,188
Members7,531
| |
Most Online5,900
Dec 19th, 2019
|
|
|
|
