#71558
09/30/2008 01:53 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 103
|
OP
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 103 |
I would appreciate some help with this frog. Li would fit something not much larger than a dress bayonet. The marks on the back are: AAZ 12 and in a separate location 11.II.3.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
|
|
|
#71559
09/30/2008 01:54 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 103
|
|
OP
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 103 |
|
|
|
#71560
09/30/2008 02:03 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 103
|
|
OP
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 103 |
Comparison to K98 Service Bayonet.
|
|
|
#71561
09/30/2008 02:55 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 5,130 Likes: 24
|
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 5,130 Likes: 24 |
I've seen similar frogs on some Imperial hirschfängers. Maybe Houston or Gary can comment on the reverse stampings?
GDC Gold Badge #290
GDC Silver Badge #310
|
|
|
#71562
09/30/2008 03:25 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 103
|
|
OP
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 103 |
Yes, I agree. I actually purchased it in the hopes that it was for a Hirschfanger. It would be a very tight fit for the TR Hirschfanger, but will work fine with the Imperial ones. I would be very happy if that is in fact what it is for.
Wolfgang
|
|
|
#71563
10/24/2008 07:41 AM
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
It could also be for an Imperial sidearm- like a police sword for one of the states, or maybe a naval cadet style.
|
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics31,667
Posts329,017
Members7,516
| |
Most Online5,900
Dec 19th, 2019
|
|
|
12 members (Don Scowen, Documentalist, Nietzsche, Stephen, Evgeniy, Jonesy, benten, ojje, Mikee, Chief, ed773, Vern),
479
guests, and
103
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
