#69063
03/15/2008 09:01 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 48
|
OP
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 48 |
Today I recieved this Poster. Is it real or fake one??? Thanks
|
|
|
#69064
03/15/2008 09:03 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 48
|
|
OP
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 48 |
|
|
|
#69065
03/15/2008 09:04 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 48
|
|
OP
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 48 |
|
|
|
#69066
03/15/2008 02:11 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 3,439
|
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 3,439 |
I would really need to see super close ups of the printing technique to be sure, but even from here it doesn't give me the warm fuzzies.
It is in remarkable condition for not being framed. That is always a red flag for me on posters.
|
|
|
#69067
03/16/2008 10:19 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 48
|
|
OP
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 48 |
thanks for the answer  ! Here a closeup - best i can du with my camera
|
|
|
#69068
03/16/2008 10:21 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 48
|
|
OP
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 48 |
|
|
|
#69069
03/16/2008 10:23 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 48
|
|
OP
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 48 |
|
|
|
#69070
03/16/2008 04:08 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 3,439
|
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 3,439 |
can you shoot through a loupe?
need to see of there is a dot pattern..
also new paper will react to UV light, which is another tool in determening originality.
|
|
|
#69071
03/16/2008 04:46 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,426
|
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,426 |
I am not the expert for these poster but normally I see some printing text somewhere on the bottom on original ones, like Berlin 42 ... and so on. Otherwise when this is an exeption with this poster I would say it is IMO impossible to judge paper age, printing from photos. Just my 5 cents.
|
|
|
#69072
03/16/2008 06:45 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 475
|
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 475 |
Jerry, For my own info what do you mean by a dot pattern? Do you mean that a dot pattern is indicating an original type of printing or a repo? I have a bunch of old Nazi posters and although the paper looks old etc, I think it is difficult to tell without some paper expert. Mine all have lettering at the bottom but I assume a faker would just print off the repos with the original text. UV light would be some help I suppose. Your thoughts? David
|
|
|
#69073
03/16/2008 06:51 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 475
|
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 475 |
The other thing I have been told is that most of the originals will have been folded at some point in their history just as a matter of course. If mine are original then I have a lot of fun ones but I bought them six or seven rears ago and paid not too much and have been skeptical but just didn't care. david
|
|
|
#69074
03/17/2008 06:45 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 48
|
|
OP
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 48 |
thanks for all answers. Here 2 shots through a loupe...
|
|
|
#69075
03/17/2008 06:46 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 48
|
|
OP
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 48 |
|
|
|
#69076
03/18/2008 11:42 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3 |
Sorry I think you got a reproduction. It looks like both top and bottom of the poster are cut off removing the the artists signature and the enlistment / printers information at the bottom.
|
|
|
#69077
03/19/2008 07:27 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 48
|
|
OP
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 48 |
thanks for the replys I think i�ll send it back....
|
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics31,671
Posts329,134
Members7,526
| |
Most Online5,900
Dec 19th, 2019
|
|
|
11 members (Duzig, Herman V. (aka Herr Mann), Tanker, Vern, LotusPeddler96, Nietzsche, Dean Perdue, Dave, Vik, Miroslav, ed773),
481
guests, and
48
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
