|
|
Joined: Nov 2021
Posts: 2
|
OP
Joined: Nov 2021
Posts: 2 |
Hi Guys. This was in my Dad's collection and he passed. Man is there a lot of conflicting information out there! Hopefully I can get some conclusive information so I can make a decision about possibly selling. Hopefully my pictures are of the appropriate areas to assist in evaluation. Thanks in advance!
Jeff
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,096 Likes: 99
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,096 Likes: 99 |
I would not buy it.
- The grip does not fit correctly and is not the shape of an early Eickhorn grip
- The guards are not early Eickhorn guards
- The trademark is too far up the blade
- The scabbard is painted.
Sorry, but it looks like a parts assortment.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,666 Likes: 52
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,666 Likes: 52 |
I agree with Dave, it’s a put together piece at best.
You never have enough HJ-knifes!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,030 Likes: 6
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,030 Likes: 6 |
sorry about your loss but he made a mistake..
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,037 Likes: 4
|
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,037 Likes: 4 |
That dagger may be a parts piece, but he number 53102 has been identified by Ross Kelbaugh.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,717 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,717 Likes: 2 |
Not even close to being real...just one detail is all it takes on these highly sought after Rohm SS daggers ...especially this one supposed to be an Eickhorn ...the cross guards are not Eickhorn produced.
The accent grooves are very shallow which explains the poor grip fit.
Regards Larry
Historical Stewardship is a Trusted Honor that must be kept!
|
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics31,671
Posts329,131
Members7,526
| |
Most Online5,900
Dec 19th, 2019
|
|
|
8 members (Mikee, OWN, Ilya, Documentalist, ed773, TRIPLE T, Vern, Honestmike),
526
guests, and
83
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
