|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,878 Likes: 7
|
OP
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,878 Likes: 7 |
Hi Gents,
I purchased an Eickhorn Army dagger a while back with a distinct cross-guard. I consulted with a couple high end dealers, and they confirmed it was an early Eick likely factory enhanced and probably a one off as they hadn’t noticed this cross-guard variation before. I started doing some research and discovered that there were also other examples of this cross-guard type appearing on Eickhorn army daggers. Below are the examples I have found so far including my own dagger and two from Tom Wittman’s website
The main difference is that the rounded part of the wing nearest the swaz appears to have been clipped (red arrows) so they don’t quite fit with the early types that are known. These cross-guards also include the ‘squashed’ feet typical of the Type 1 cross guard.
Last edited by Fitzer; 10/21/2023 05:04 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,878 Likes: 7
|
OP
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,878 Likes: 7 |
I think its widely agreed there are currently 4 known types of Eickhorn cross guard types. (courtesy: wardaggers.com - German Army Dagger Crossguard Makers Reference).
Judging by the configuration and details of the types I believe this (new) variation would fit somewhere between type 1 and 2. For your review. Let me know what you think and if you have any examples of this variation in your collection to share.
Cheers, John
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,150 Likes: 112
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,150 Likes: 112 |
Great photos, Fitzer,
What about the one seen on the all-aluminum Army daggers ?
Dave
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,878 Likes: 7
|
OP
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,878 Likes: 7 |
Thanks Dave,
Here is an example of the Eick aluminum type cross guard type (courtesy Tom Kendall's website). It has a very similar type cross guard but it appears to be more a type 1. Also the examples I show have brass mounts. Regardless of the fitting composition I think the cross guard variation I discuss is a 5th type. Perhaps Type 1.5 (between known types 1 and 2 :-) )
Last edited by Fitzer; 10/21/2023 10:27 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 762 Likes: 1
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 762 Likes: 1 |
Very interesting! Thanks for pointing this out.
Regards Danny
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,927 Likes: 38
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,927 Likes: 38 |
Thanks for bringing this up, very interesting Fitzer..I would love to get Denny R. take on it as well.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,878 Likes: 7
|
OP
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,878 Likes: 7 |
Thanks guys. Hoping other collectors can share examples to confirm
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 211 Likes: 14
|
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 211 Likes: 14 |
I think it has nothing to do with a different type of guard, but more like who did the final finish of the guard. The one who handled your guard just had it longer to the grinding wheel, taking off a bit more material. I have one in my collection that has a more rounded shape on the left side following the feather line from the top, and a straigh one on the right, cutting into the shape.
regards, Ger
Last edited by Gerrit1963; 01/23/2024 10:32 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,062 Likes: 34
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,062 Likes: 34 |
I think Ger hit the nail. When you look at the feathering of the wings the certain potion in question clearly is missing it´s ends, simply taken away by the grinding wheel. Might be the special taste of a foreman. Nevertheless an interesting observation which makes our hobby so complex. Regards,
wotan, gd.c-b#105
"Never look for sqare eggs" as a late owner of an original FHH-dagger used to say.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,150 Likes: 112
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,150 Likes: 112 |
I agree.
If you look closely at the early Army pommels that were hand enhanced you will see many variations where the detailer taped out slightly different pattern although the basic pommels are identical. This is the same thing.
You see similar variation in the hand enhancement of early Eickhorn crossgguards on SS,SA, and NSKK daggers.
Dave
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,878 Likes: 7
|
OP
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,878 Likes: 7 |
Thanks for the feedback guys!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,649 Likes: 2
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,649 Likes: 2 |
It's ALL in the DETAILS!!.......
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,878 Likes: 7
|
OP
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,878 Likes: 7 |
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics31,735
Posts330,183
Members7,626
|
Most Online5,900 Dec 19th, 2019
|
|
|
|