|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 456
|
OP
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 456 |
Hey Guys,
Just a question here. Has anyone who owns or has seen an over the shoulder Eickhorn Dagger being equipped with a WKC scabbard? Being very late period i could assume that Eickhorn might have not had stock of their own, and maybe used an alternative makers scabbard. Would interest me as I've come across a few very late period daggers that were not textbook for that maker? thanks in advance,
Even the Gods are helpless against stupidity!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 4,939 Likes: 24
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 4,939 Likes: 24 |
Hello Dion, in few cases EICKHORN did things most collectors look at as "not period" manufactured. I once have owned a -for me doubtless original- unissued EICKHORN navy with a WKC crossguard. Armies by EICKHORN sometimes have the generic B crossguard. In some cases EICKHORN had a kind of cooporation with HOERSTER (eg HJleader daggers or RRPP daggers). So I would say that it is not impossible that EICKHORN did use for their late armies a WKC scabbard although up to now I personally have not seen such a variant. Regards,
wotan, gd.c-b#105
"Never look for sqare eggs" as a late owner of an original FHH-dagger used to say.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,013 Likes: 2
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,013 Likes: 2 |
50 years ago, we would take daggers and swap parts and scabbards and never gave it a second thought. The details and tit-tat of today were TOTALLY ignored.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 4,939 Likes: 24
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 4,939 Likes: 24 |
50 years ago, we would take daggers and swap parts and scabbards and never gave it a second thought. The details and tit-tat of today were TOTALLY ignored. Yes, and now it is the time to try to sort out what was done period and what afterwards... Regards,
wotan, gd.c-b#105
"Never look for sqare eggs" as a late owner of an original FHH-dagger used to say.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 456
|
OP
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 456 |
Thanks for your opinions Gentlemen. Very true statements and I agree. We of course know that scabbards were sometimes swapped around by mistake, especially amoungst the GI's during and after the war while comparing booty. But i also think that towards the end of the manufacturing period, lots of manufacturers, including the big ones, sold and bought to be able to commit to orders, albeit only a few orders! I guess these questions will never really be answered, so I guess, as was stated by Wotan in another thread, one needs to look at the componants and decide whether they have the same patina and whether they were assembled together back then. It certainly wasnt everyday practice that various parts from various producers were used, but I'm convinced this did happen.
Even the Gods are helpless against stupidity!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 171 Likes: 7
|
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 171 Likes: 7 |
To stay on the save side i would never buy an Alcoso, Eickhorn or Pack army dagger with parts that weren't produced in their own plants. Patina matches after 50 years + so if swapped in the 60ths, 70ths or even the 80ths you will not be able to tell.
Regards Ger
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 5,102 Likes: 18
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 5,102 Likes: 18 |
To stay on the save side i would never buy an Alcoso, Eickhorn or Pack army dagger with parts that weren't produced in their own plants. Patina matches after 50 years + so if swapped in the 60ths, 70ths or even the 80ths you will not be able to tell.
Regards Ger Ger raises an excellent point and it’s something we see all the time. Something may have come home from the war exactly as it is but many collectors are put off by something not being “textbook”. I like the unusual especially if it has vet provenance but non-textbook usually means it’s worth less.
GDC Gold Badge #290 GDC Silver Badge #310
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics31,561
Posts327,201
Members7,407
|
Most Online5,900 Dec 19th, 2019
|
|
9 members (JR, Jonesy, Evgeniy, Nietzsche, SpitfireVb, Reichskriegerbun, ed773, Kurt_Menliff, Kurt),
75
guests, and
81
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|