|
|
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 193 Likes: 3
|
OP
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 193 Likes: 3 |
Your opinion on these please, they look as good original rings
Thank you
Ado
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 193 Likes: 3
|
|
OP
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 193 Likes: 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 238 Likes: 1
|
|
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 238 Likes: 1 |
Norge ring is good.
I don't this that first one is related to Langemarck
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,935 Likes: 31
|
|
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,935 Likes: 31 |
I've seen that top one show up on eBay once in a while - G said "too weird for me!" I finally realized that spaced out moose looking thing is supposed to be the lion (but it's sideways). Still looks s$$ty even sideways.. (wtf is it sideways?!?) weird a$$ ring to me. Even if it was real it would still look like crap IMHO
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,022 Likes: 31
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,022 Likes: 31 |
Concerning the socalled "Langemarck" ring, you can clearly see that the cartouche is a seperate part. Perhaps kind of plastic, perhaps mother-of-pearl looking. It obviously was taken from any separate item and -at any time- put into the old ring. Which might have had a stone in it. Therefore, as the lion is from another item, it is not correctly fitting the ring and looks sideways.
You might bet when the cartouche was put in, you will never know for sure.
Regards,
wotan, gd.c-b#105
"Never look for sqare eggs" as a late owner of an original FHH-dagger used to say.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,935 Likes: 31
|
|
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,935 Likes: 31 |
+1 Wotan just nailed it. That's exactly right.... love when u post on the ring forum Wotan!!
|
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics31,670
Posts329,077
Members7,519
| |
Most Online5,900
Dec 19th, 2019
|
|
|
|
