|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 264
|
OP
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 264 |
Hello, My friend bought this dagger. What are your opinions about the originality and in particular of a stamp. Best regards Vitaliy
All people can wrong, but only fools persist in the errors
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 264
|
OP
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 264 |
All people can wrong, but only fools persist in the errors
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,814 Likes: 18
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,814 Likes: 18 |
The trademark orientation is wrong and the etch looks a bit off for me.
John
Always looking for Eickhorns and etched bayonets.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 264
|
OP
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 264 |
Hi John, I also see the etching The mark should be stamped but not as etched regards Vitaliy
All people can wrong, but only fools persist in the errors
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,021 Likes: 31
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,021 Likes: 31 |
Hello alien, the trademark and a LOT of other features (eg the clamshell) make clear that it is a forest cutlass made after may ´45. Regards,
wotan, gd.c-b#105
"Never look for sqare eggs" as a late owner of an original FHH-dagger used to say.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,021 Likes: 31
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,021 Likes: 31 |
Here is an original #1712 from EICKHORN, compare the clamshell... Regards,
6.JPG (125.42 KB, 134 downloads)
wotan, gd.c-b#105
"Never look for sqare eggs" as a late owner of an original FHH-dagger used to say.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 264
|
OP
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 264 |
Hi wotan, Thanks Regards Vitaliy
All people can wrong, but only fools persist in the errors
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics31,670
Posts329,074
Members7,519
|
Most Online5,900 Dec 19th, 2019
|
|
|
|