|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,201 Likes: 3
|
OP
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,201 Likes: 3 |
Hi all - well out of my price league and sphere of collecting but i spotted this on a lot-tissimo and thought i would share the link: http://www.lot-tissimo.com/de/i/8814161/p/1/not the best of pics but looks at least period 1g.jpg (76.02 KB, 457 downloads)
GDC silver member #393
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,201 Likes: 3
|
|
OP
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,201 Likes: 3 |
2
2.jpg (79.75 KB, 455 downloads)
GDC silver member #393
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,201 Likes: 3
|
|
OP
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,201 Likes: 3 |
3
3.jpg (77.26 KB, 467 downloads)
GDC silver member #393
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,201 Likes: 3
|
|
OP
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,201 Likes: 3 |
And a period pic of him with dagger
GDC silver member #393
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 257 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 257 Likes: 2 |
a pity that its fittings have been so heavy polished...but seems a right piece
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,133 Likes: 109
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,133 Likes: 109 |
Am I the only one who thinks the blade shape is wrong? Too narrow towards the bottom and perhaps too short.
Dave
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,044 Likes: 6
|
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,044 Likes: 6 |
The blade shape and the scabbard don't look right but it may be distortion by the photos.
Last edited by Skyline Drive; 01/24/2015 01:22 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,133 Likes: 109
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,133 Likes: 109 |
Correct! I would want to see a lot more before thinking about whether it was correct.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 70
|
|
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 70 |
The original owner may have polished the tip off. They didn't have simi -chrome back then.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,133 Likes: 109
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,133 Likes: 109 |
Simichrome did not do that. If I am correct, the blade is either an aged fake or it had a broken tip and was reground.
Also note the lack of detail in the trademark but no loss in the dedication.
Dave
2a.jpg (16.97 KB, 338 downloads)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,024 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,024 Likes: 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,077
|
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,077 |
The eagle appears a little low on the grip than usually seen, but this is also the case in the period photo.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 682
|
|
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 682 |
When you look on the website you can actually see that there's something wrong with the blade. First of all the tip (like Dave said)is not 100% and the maker mark seems to have a lot of wear while the dedication is still nice and crisp.
Maybe this was a partial ground Rohm but they put the name back on to jack up the price? Who knows?
Gruss,
Gerry
Die Treue ist das Mark der Ehre!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,133 Likes: 109
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,133 Likes: 109 |
The trademark is strange. I have seen many daggers where the trademark has been partially ground away and they do not look like that. What I think it might be is a fake blade with an obviously bad trademark that someone had effaced.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 629 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 629 Likes: 2 |
I think this is a dagger in the upcoming Thies auction.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,133 Likes: 109
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 15,133 Likes: 109 |
Yes, I just checked. There are better photos and it is a Boker. They mention the number, but do not ID the owner.
They have the number "6500" but I do not read enough German to tell whether that is the sales estimate or the reserve. Not very much for an unground Rohm owned by a Gruppenfuhrer (?)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 629 Likes: 2
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 629 Likes: 2 |
That is the reserve price in Euros. Plus, of course, commission of 23 o/o.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,044 Likes: 6
|
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,044 Likes: 6 |
Not trying to stray off topic here, but the photo distortion of the SS dagger in question may be the culprit and not the actual dagger. An SA dagger was just posted in this thread that exhibits the same misleading distortion. I'd post it here but it's 198kb and it's too large to upload. (I don't know how the original poster managed it.) http://phpstack-500133-1583587.cloudwaysapps.com/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=304323#Post304323It is the last post:#304717 - 01/29/15 02:31 AM
Last edited by Skyline Drive; 01/29/2015 05:52 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 933
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 933 |
That is the reserve price in Euros. Plus, of course, commission of 23 o/o. As far as i know,the dagger was sold for 8k plus commission Very low for an Full R�hm 
|
|
|
|
|
MAX 2024
by Gaspare - 09/07/2024 03:44 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics31,719
Posts329,982
Members7,611
| |
Most Online5,900
Dec 19th, 2019
|
|
|
|
![[Linked Image from germandaggers.com]](http://www.germandaggers.com/minibanners/lst.jpg)
