|
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 74
|
OP
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 74 |
Gentleman
Can I get some opinion's as to original or not before I make a offer.
All opinions will be appreciated.
thanks
Mike
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 74
|
|
OP
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 74 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 74
|
|
OP
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 74 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 74
|
|
OP
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 74 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 74
|
|
OP
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 74 |
Gentleman
My eyes are not as good as they used to be but I see differences i think in the eagle at the scabbards top and other minor differences although I am sure there were slight variations in the originals as they were all hand assembled and hand finished. These were not precision made but more of a art for decoration.
Any pointed differences will be appreciated, It is very hard for me to judge from pictures only.
thanks
mike
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,022 Likes: 31
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,022 Likes: 31 |
Hello, HYleader-daggers did become a minefield since the new fakes did appear. In most cases an in hand inspection is necessary.
From your pics I think to see SEVERAL (eagle, leather, pommel, makermark, gripwire and more) features which are connected to these new fakes. I would not want this dagger (and also these hangers!) in my collection and I therefore would not make an offer on them.
Regards,
wotan, gd.c-b#105
"Never look for sqare eggs" as a late owner of an original FHH-dagger used to say.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 74
|
|
OP
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 74 |
Thanks Wotan i think you are 100% correct.
After some more research I have come to the same conclusion, especially the eagle on the scabbard it is a bad copy.
thanks again
|
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics31,670
Posts329,076
Members7,522
| |
Most Online5,900
Dec 19th, 2019
|
|
|
8 members (Aratycho, Stephen, The_Collector, Documentalist, TRIPLE T, BretVanSant, Gerrit1963, atis),
376
guests, and
137
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
