#32685
11/08/2009 12:25 PM
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,344
|
OP
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,344 |
hi all,,i would also like your opinion on the bottom tab,the "63"....thanks,,RObert
|
|
|
#32686
11/08/2009 12:25 PM
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,344
|
|
OP
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,344 |
|
|
|
#32687
11/08/2009 02:13 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,426
|
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,426 |
original and good we don't have to talk about the Gen tabs 
|
|
|
#32688
11/08/2009 04:09 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 3,439
|
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 3,439 |
The #'ed tab is nice. oh, come on, lets talk about the Generals tabs. Booooooooooooooooooooo!!!!  wrong shaped sloppy embroidery to leaves & pips wrong thick tight piping wrong backing paper and the totaly fake RZM tag was not worth the 5 minutes they spent faking it. I have seen these tabs with the tag & backing removed to try & fool collectors. I think they came out in the 1960's
|
|
|
#32689
11/08/2009 09:36 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 111
|
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 111 |
Does this mean the thick but loose , As opposed to tight(MrJerry) piping on early ss collar tabs is okay? Not that they would have had the same oakleaf as shown of course.
|
|
|
#32690
11/08/2009 10:26 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 408
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 408 |
63 tab is a nice original including the rzm tag. It is in itself a nice find  Generals tabs are clearly bad. Nothng like the war time ones. I am sorry. If you do a search and compare with photos, even the small pics in Angolias SS cloth insignias, you will see the difference. //Felix
|
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics31,669
Posts329,117
Members7,524
| |
Most Online5,900
Dec 19th, 2019
|
|
|
|
