|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 264
|
OP
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 264 |
Hallo One year different stamps Different numbers and letters What do you say gentlemen? Best regards. 1051/38,     1051/39   
Last edited by alien; 09/18/2012 08:53 PM.
All people can wrong, but only fools persist in the errors
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 264
|
|
OP
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 264 |
Here's one more  
All people can wrong, but only fools persist in the errors
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 264
|
|
OP
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 264 |
Do not have any opinions about this
Last edited by alien; 09/19/2012 05:27 PM.
All people can wrong, but only fools persist in the errors
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 925
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 925 |
I saw a few different real blades of this Trademark. Letter style and digits were the same,as you've shown on pic 1,2 & 4
This company had used different TM,letters...and a different placement of the RZM-TM..imo
Do you have more pics of these daggers/blades? Mottos,Tangmarks....
Hard to judge,from this pics.
Gerd
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 264
|
|
OP
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 264 |
All people can wrong, but only fools persist in the errors
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 264
|
|
OP
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 264 |
1051/39  
All people can wrong, but only fools persist in the errors
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 264
|
|
OP
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 264 |
1051/39   Regards, Vitaliy
All people can wrong, but only fools persist in the errors
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 925
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 925 |
Thanks for the additional pics.
I don't like all of these,eg.the motto of the last one you have shown looks too far down.BTW, i never saw the two storks on RZM blades with the TM close to the lower crossguard. These blades bearing different tang marks.
Gerd
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 264
|
|
OP
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 264 |
So you want to say it's a fake?
Vitaliy
All people can wrong, but only fools persist in the errors
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 264
|
|
OP
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 264 |
Hallo Gerd, Here are photos of storks  
All people can wrong, but only fools persist in the errors
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 925
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 925 |
I have doubts on a few of these....
And thanks for the pic of the "storks"
Do you own all of these daggers?
Here is a shot of the tangmarks from one of mine. I've bought this dagger a few years ago.The TM is close to the crossguard.
These two pics are also shown in Ralf's SS-Book.
No other comments?
Last edited by kreta1961; 09/24/2012 09:23 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 264
|
|
OP
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 264 |
Hello Gerd,
I have no doubt about the authenticity of these daggers.
I believe that storks more typical of the manufacturer, than the brand that you have shown.
Siegert books I do not have on hand unfortunately.
Regards,
Vitaliy
All people can wrong, but only fools persist in the errors
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 264
|
|
OP
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 264 |
All people can wrong, but only fools persist in the errors
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 925
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 925 |
I guess,so as many others ,these codes 1051/1052/1053 and 1054 are contract numbers. This would explain,the different letter-style,digits and tang marks,etc.
E.G., if you compare an 1053 with an 1054 you'll see no differences.TM and motto are absolutly identical.Take a look at an early klaas r�hm,you'll see St marked crossguards and the "double arrow" tang-mark.
I'm sure the owners of the r�hm klaas can confirm that.
Well it ends as a two man conversation.
Have a nice weekend!
Gerd
Last edited by kreta1961; 09/28/2012 08:49 PM.
|
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics31,673
Posts329,154
Members7,529
| |
Most Online5,900
Dec 19th, 2019
|
|
|
11 members (The_Collector, seany, Dave, JME, Documentalist, derjager, Evgeniy, Nietzsche, 3226, den70, Stephen),
634
guests, and
82
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
