|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 37
|
OP
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 37 |
Last edited by magnusmilitaria; 08/03/2012 02:58 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 37
|
|
OP
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 37 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 762 Likes: 1
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 762 Likes: 1 |
The scabbard is a typical WKC product. The crossguard looks like the 3rd style Eickhorn but � don't like it. It doesn't look the same as the Eickhorn crossguards I've seen. Here's a picture for comparison (3rd and 4th style Eickhorn)
Danny
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,290
|
|
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,290 |
Danny the guard looks like an Eickhorn Type -1 I have to agree on the scabbard though does not look like an Eickhorn product to me either?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 762 Likes: 1
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 762 Likes: 1 |
I think you are right Tom. I've taken T. Wittman's Army book and I still think it looks different from the textbook. I'm pretty sure the scabbard is a WKC product because of the oval scabbard opening and the single side screw. As far as I know only WKC did this.
Danny
|
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics31,669
Posts329,115
Members7,524
| |
Most Online5,900
Dec 19th, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
