#25226
06/07/2009 01:39 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,523
|
OP
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,523 |
Can someone give me a snapshot of what this document is?
A brief synopsis would be great.
D
|
|
|
#25227
06/07/2009 01:39 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,523
|
|
OP
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,523 |
|
|
|
#25228
06/07/2009 01:40 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,523
|
|
OP
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,523 |
|
|
|
#25229
06/07/2009 01:41 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,523
|
|
OP
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,523 |
It looks like an auto pen like many of the Hitler Christmas cards.
D
|
|
|
#25230
06/07/2009 03:22 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,025 Likes: 1
|
|
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,025 Likes: 1 |
Award document for the SS Officer's sword.
(authenticity, I have no idea)
|
|
|
#25231
06/07/2009 03:38 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,523
|
|
OP
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,523 |
Thanks..
I suppose it doesnt say who its given to??
|
|
|
#25232
06/07/2009 03:31 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,025 Likes: 1
|
|
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,025 Likes: 1 |
No, they are not named. They are a generic form and like the SS Honor Ring document, both were awarded as unnamed.
John
(heavily and quality reproduced)
|
|
|
#25233
06/07/2009 03:49 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,523
|
|
OP
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,523 |
Hi,
Who is an authority on documents so I can run it by him?
thanks
|
|
|
#25234
06/09/2009 03:51 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,026
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,026 |
Don't honor ring documents have the complete name on them ?
"Those who do not remember the past are condemned to relive it" Santayana
|
|
|
#25235
07/13/2009 05:30 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,023 Likes: 31
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,023 Likes: 31 |
IMO (I do have several HH documents, also an original Degen award document) this is NO original document.
First it is missing the name and other datas of the bestowed (these docs alwasy have/had these datas).
Second it seems to be a ft best a faximile signature and docs at this early time (due to the certain printing style) always have an original signed signature. The date does not conform to this style of document.
The date alswas was written with a typewriter.
Looks (for me for sure) like a modern reprint.
Regards,
wotan, gd.c-b#105
"Never look for sqare eggs" as a late owner of an original FHH-dagger used to say.
|
|
|
#25236
07/13/2009 10:14 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,523
|
|
OP
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,523 |
Thanks.. The piece didnt "speak" to me so it went back the next day after I posted it..
thanks though..
|
|
|
#25237
09/18/2009 07:00 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,621
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,621 |
quote: Originally posted by wotan:
IMO (I do have several HH documents, also an original Degen award document) this is NO original document.
First it is missing the name and other datas of the bestowed (these docs alwasy have/had these datas).
Second it seems to be a ft best a faximile signature and docs at this early time (due to the certain printing style) always have an original signed signature. The date does not conform to this style of document.
The date alswas was written with a typewriter.
Looks (for me for sure) like a modern reprint.
Regards,
Just seen, i agree complete with wotan.Not original!
|
|
|
|
Forums42
Topics31,669
Posts329,100
Members7,524
| |
Most Online5,900
Dec 19th, 2019
|
|
|
|
